Accomplishment, for instance, with infrastructure that s just a lost opportunity. yeah, it really is the example of the shift in where the parties are and who they are appealing to. and we saw with hillary clinton the number of working class, even union households go down when it came to her support. it crept back up a bit because joe the biden, who was on the ballot, the question of course is what s going to happen this year. it does seem as though trump still has a grip on this white working-class demographic, particularly in the rust belt, when you talk about ohio and pennsylvania. i even spoke to a gop operative in pennsylvania yesterday who was not a trump fan but says that they believe if he s the nominee there s a really real chance that he could win. it s interesting that he still happens to have this grip. all right, everybody. thank you so much. thank you for joining inside
Essentially tied his republican opponents in the white working-class demographic in both 1992 and 1996. so why did the white working class vote for bill and not for hillary? what they ve become over the last couple of decades is the party of the professional class, highly educated affluent while collar people. david brooks says hillary clinton fits into this category perfectly. went to a fancy school, married a guy from a fancy law school. lives in the sorts of places where those people would gather. if it sounds like he simply describing rich people here, brooks says there s a very important distinction between rich entrepreneurs, people who create companies and make things
Working class. in the name of the hard-working americans who make up our forgotten middle class, i proudly accept your nomination for president of the united states. bill clinton was only part of the transition of the working class people to a party that was very concerned about the innovation. the party had to stay awake during the presidency. they made it into that tent, and into the big democratic tent went the elites of america, its lawyers and doctors and stockbrokers. but let s remember, clinton essentially tied his republican opponents in the white working class demographic in both 1992 and 1996. so why did the white working
Stockbrokers. but let s remember, clinton essentially tied his republican opponents in the white working class demographic in both 1992 and 1996. so why did the white working class vote for bill and not for hillary? what they have become over the last couple of decades, is the party of this professional class, this white educated upper class of people. hillary clinton fits into this class perfectly. she went to a fancy law school, married a guy from a fancy law school, lives in the places where those people would gather. if it sounds like he s simply describing rich people here, brooks session there s a very important distinction between rich entrepreneurs, people who create companies and make things and employ people and professionals.
Working class. in the name of the hard-working americans who make up our forgotten middle class, i proudly accept your nomination for president of the united states. bill clinton is the sort of emblematic figure in the transition of the democratic party from the party that cares about working-class middle-class people to a party that is very much concerned with the innovation, economy, and wall street and all that. frank s right. the democratic party did change during bill clinton s presidency. bill clinton made the party a bigger tent. and into that big democratic tent went the elites of america. its lawyers and doctors and stockbrokers. but let s remember, clinton essentially tied his republican opponents in the white working-class demographic in both 1992 and 1996. so why did the white working