the court s website, but adds the court s final opinion has not been released and will be issued in due course. this case is about whether women, people have the right to receive emergency care, for women specifically, emergency abortion care in a state that bans abortion. the biden administration is arguing, yes, it is federal law that a hospital must provide emergency medical treatment, no matter what. the groups who supported the biden suit offered a number of examples including an example of a woman who was 18 weeks pregnant experiencing a condition that would result in a miscarriage. but instead of treating her, idaho doctors sent her home worried they would be breaking the law by giving her an emergency abortion. her condition was so dire that traveling to another state was out of the question because the risk of miscarrying and bleeding to death was too high. so she waited. eventually, she delivered a stillborn baby and consequentially developed a serious and rapidly d
“The law is the law. There’s no gender to it. And whoever’s in those positions, it’s about enforcing and interpreting the law the way it’s written,” Parson said Monday.
samuel alito says, a right to abortion services is not, quote, deeply rooted in this nation s history. women on the supreme court are not deeply rooted in this nation s history. no one says that women can some peruvian on the supreme court. nowhere does the constitution say black people can serve on the supreme court. the founders thought that only white men should, ever, serve on the supreme court. the founders were the original proponents of affirmative action, exclusively, four white men. the founders, deeply, and fervently, believed in carrying out the mass murder of the native tribes in this continent, and enslaving as many black people, as was necessary, for white men. to reigns supreme, in this land. that is deeply rooted in this nation s community. it is deeply rooted in this
violation of the mystery that is, quote, egregious breach of trust. it was what they feel when they lose their privacy. it is egregious for them. they don t see how they would be, when they take their privacy away. the private in the supreme court, is invaded by the alito first draft, of a revocation of the constitutional right. samuel alito says, a right to abortion services is not, quote, deeply rooted in this nation s history. women on the supreme court are not deeply rooted in this nation s history. no one says that women can some peruvian on the supreme court. nowhere does the constitution say black people can serve on the supreme court. the founders thought that only white men should, ever, serve on the supreme court. the founders were the original proponents of affirmative action, exclusively, four white men. the founders, deeply, and fervently, believed in carrying out the mass murder of the native tribes in this continent, and enslaving as many black
male governors in florida and arizona and texas don t want the body to be covered by a four-inch piece of encloses against mask mandates. we re going to reach deep into the uterus of a woman and tell all of them to carry 85% of abortions take place after the six-week mark that the texas law bans. what is the real world effect here? well, that is the point, right, that you have both in legislators a group of men, namely men on the supreme court making a determination about a woman s choice about her own body, and i think that as matthew has pointed out the danger is not for the wealthy woman who will fly anywhere fly to europe, fly to south or central america, fly across the country but for black and brown women, for poor women, for rural women who really won t have a