engagement based ranking all together? facebook is going to say you don t want to give up engagement based ranking. you re not going to like facebook as much if we re not picking out the content for you. that s just not true. there are a lot of, facebook looks to present things as false choices. imagine we ordered our feeds by time. like on i message or there are other forms of social media that are chronologically based. they re going to say you re going to get spamed like you re not going to enjoy your feed. the reality is that those experiences have a lot of permutations. there are ways that we can make those experiences where computers don t regulate what we see. we together socially regulate what we see. but they don t want us to have that conversation because facebook knows that when they pick out the content we focus on using computers, we spend more time on their platform. they make more money. the dangers of engagement based ranking are that facebook knows that con
Moderation process. importantly, witthe act would explore the viability for a federal program for big tech employees to blow the whistle on wrong doing inside the companies where they work. we should encourage employees inside the tech sector like you to speak up about questionable practices of big tech companies, so we can among other thing, ensure americans of how they re using artificial intelligence and opaque algorithms to keep them hook oed on the platform. we learned from the information that you provided that facebook conducts what s called engagement based ranking, which you ve described as very dangerous. can you talk more about why it s dangerous and do you think congress should seek to pass legislation like the filter bubble act that would giver users the ability to avoid