Nonprofit work to advance Religious Freedom for everyone. Ont this is source of individual human dignity and flourishing. That is a source of political stability economic development, and international security. Bring to the issue that years of research the Religious Freedoms, the analysis and impact as tom does. Doctor far served as 28 years in the u. S. Army, in the u. S. Foreign service. In 1999, he become the first director of the State Department Office of international Religious Freedom. He directed at the Witherspoon Institute international religious Freedom Earth Task force and it was a member of the chicago world affairs council Task Force on religion in the u. S. Foreign policy. Talk to the national Defense University and serve in the secretary of States Earth working group. From 2008 2018, he was associate professor at the practice of Religion Inhe World affairs at georgetown universitys walsh school of foreign service. He also directed the religious Freedom Project at georg
And for everyone both as a source of individual human dignity and is a source of clinical stability, economic development and international security. You bring to the issue of Religious Freedom the years of research, analysis and impact. Dr. Ferrer served 28 years in the u. S. Army and the u. S. Foreign service. In 1999 he became the first director of the State Department Office of international Religious Freedom. He subsequently directed the Witherspoon Institute international Religious Freedom Task Force. Was a member of the chicago world affairs council Task Force on religion and u. S. Foreign policy, topped the national Defense University and served on the secretary of State Earth working group. From 2008 to 2018 dr. Ferrer was associate professor of the practice of Religion And World affairs at georgetown university at the school of foreign service. He also directed the religious Freedom Project at Georgetowns Center which became the Religious Freedom institute. In addition to lea
Clinical stability, economic development and international security. You bring to the issue of Religious Freedom the years of research, analysis and impact. Dr. Ferrer served 28 years in the u. S. Army and the u. S. Foreign service. In 1999 he became the first director of the State Department Office of international Religious Freedom. He subsequently directed the Witherspoon Institute international Religious Freedom Task Force. Was a member of the chicago world affairs council Task Force on religion and u. S. Foreign policy, topped the national Defense University and served on the secretary of State Earth working group. From 2008 to 2018 dr. Ferrer was associate professor of the practice of Religion And World affairs at georgetown university at the school of foreign service. He also directed the religious Freedom Project at Georgetowns Center which became the Religious Freedom institute. In addition to leading that tom is a senior fellow at the institute for studies of religion at Bayl
Development and international security. You bring to the issue of Religious Freedom the years of research, analysis and impact. Dr. Ferrer served 28 years in the u. S. Army and the u. S. Foreign service. In 1999 he became the first director of the State Department Office of international Religious Freedom. He subsequently directed the Witherspoon Institute international Religious Freedom Task Force. Was a member of the chicago world affairs council Task Force on religion and u. S. Foreign policy, topped the national Defense University and served on the secretary of State Earth working group. From 2008 to 2018 dr. Ferrer was associate professor of the practice of Religion And World affairs at georgetown university at the school of foreign service. He also directed the religious Freedom Project at Georgetowns Center which became the Religious Freedom institute. In addition to leading that tom is a senior fellow at the institute for studies of religion at Baylor University and he also ser
Introduction
Although the June 26, 2023 International Ecclesiastical Institutional Complaint Against Opus Dei for Regulatory Fraud Against the Holy See and the Members Themselves, featured in Part IV of this series, laid out many of the dangerous institutional regulatory practices of Opus Dei, there were other key issues that were not addressed.