baseless, convoluted indictmentt . i it is bizarrely centered around what is clearlbizay protected speech, zero criminal statutes, because there are none that were applicable that are actually written intl statut is based on an obscure law frome the civid l war. so let s be even more clear. this indictment is frankly not, worth the paper that it s printed on. this is indicis franka politicn through and through. there is a reason that donaldpec trump s poll numbers keep going he goes single timeut through yet another attack like this by liberal activists, is. attorneys general. the american people are seeing through all of thi liberalt s ae biden s so-called department of aty outjusticw officiall of control. d, en s ag, merrick garlane, who signed off on this charade. remember the department ofbiden justice is part of the executive branch. they have now gone ful merrickla republic. he s not even making any attempt to presentexecut ve nown the appearance of fairness. otherarlan
sweetheart plea deal, at least for now. the u.s. district judge maryellen noreika is her name question legality of the plea agreement and wanted to know if hunter was under an active investigation for other crimes like feral violations and other financial issues which he was in trouble until it left the statute of limitations run out. as it turns out according to prosecutions, hunter remains a subject of at least one ongoing criminal probe and could be charged with future crimes. apparently hunter s attorneys were under the impression that this deal would grant their client full immunity from any future charges. they believe that the sweetheart deals slap on the wrist deal consisting of two minor distributions would wipe the slate clean. when the judge asked if you have any precedents on this kind of deal, they could incite a single case. why do i have a hard time believing this very important critical point they came on an agreement on was not fully vetted and agreed to befo
that is according to a problem legal analysts say whistle-blowers did to hunter biden and the biden family. kevin is live in the capital with more on the hearing and what is next. gary shapley testifying today that the u.s. attorney for d.c., who was a appointed by the president had to file to say whether charges would be filed against hunter biden. based on my experience, the u.s. department s office and handling the investigation was different from any other case in my 14 years. at every stage, decisions were made. according to the national review, his wife, a liberal activist, has visited the white house at least 28 times since biden took office, including ten times in the first three months of this year alone. the identity of a second irs whistle-blower was revealed today. he explained he is not partisan. he says he is a democrat who wants to do the right thing. they were recommending for approval, felony and misdemeanor charges. that did not happen here and i am
stonewalling steps that may have led to president biden. it appeared to me, based on what i experienced, that the u.s. attorney in delaware, in our investigation, was constantly hamstrung, limited and marginalized by doj officials, as well as other u.s. attorneys. i still think that a special counsel is necessary for this investigation. assigned prosecutors did not appear to follow the normal investigative process, slow walk to the investigation, and put in place unnecessary approvals and roadblocks from effectively and efficiently investigating the case. a number of times, we were not able to follow the facts. prosecutors instructed investigators not to ask about the big guy or dad when conducting interviews. investigators were not allowed to follow-up on whatsapp messages from hunter biden s apple i cloud backup where he says suggested he was sitting next to his father. greg: ziegler also laid out how he was writing off hookers and rooms for his drug dealer while part
departmental practice is to contact the u.s. attorney s office for the district in question to whether or not whether they want to partner on the case. if not, i may request special attorney status from the attorney general. here i administer that if necessary, i would be granted sex shun five 15 authority in the district of columbia, the central district of california or any other district where charges could be brought in this matter. okay? it is the difference as mrs. ocasio-cortez said between special counsel and special attorney, which might explain the confusion or the disagreement here. in any event, the u.s. attorney for delaware had all of the authority he needed to bring whatever charges he wanted wherever he wanted and he is the witness for that. thank you, mr. chairman. i d like to be clear that he was assured that authority. he was he was. he said he was assured the authority. and he is limited within delaware. right. but that s the rules. just restatin