Trial within the next six months and that does not sit well with those on the right. Im pissed, this is over and over again. This is disgraceful, we have never indicted former president and a leading candidate for president and this is joe biden and democrats weaponizing the Justice System because they are afraid of the voters. This is disgraceful and it is abuse of power by angry democrats who decided the rule of law doesnt matter to them anymore. Todd Brooke Singman spoke with former President Trump last night. Brooke i did speak with the former president and he says fourth indictment comes during a dark period for our country, but he wont let it stop him. President trump told me this politically inspired indictment, which could have been brought three years ago is smack dab in the middle of my political campaign, where i lead all republicans. Trump was indicted last night along with 18 others, Rudy Giuliani, john eastman, Sydney Powell and mark meadows. The charges come after year l
Laura not just unquestionably fair minded, he does cardio, and weights. His personal health and exercise correlates to how he approaches prosecution and strategy. Jack smith will Donald Trumps head as he sits in a prison cell. Laura the real jack smith is just another attack dog in the kennel of antitrump prosecutors trying to make a name for himself. One person who counts most now is saying, hold your horses, judge cannon slapped down the doj absurd request to file motions under seal. Cant have the people knowing anything, right . Judge cannon is putting smith team on the spot about use of a Dc Grand Jury to gather evidence after it indicted trump in florida using a grand jury in miami. The case was brought in the miami Federal District court, so it makes a lot of sense. Dc grand jury is what smith, mr. Unassailable prefers. The get trump media, who has tried to discredit conon, went bon customers. Judge cannon will make the prosecutors work. We have a judge who may be a loose cannon
ability to overcome them than be anywhere else in the world. we begin tonight with growing presidential primary field. will hurd, former texas congressman and former cia officer, has thrown his hat in the ring. re-election was a tough fight, and he served on the house intelligence committee. why is he running for president? will he sign the pledge and support the nominee no matter who he or she may be? what will he do if he were president? let s find out. congressman will hurd, thank you for joining us. thank you, and amen, i agree, we are lucky to live where we live. trey: what did you see when you surveyed the existing candidates that led you to say, i m jumping in and going to run to be leader of the free world? sure, there is a path for a dark-horse candidate like me. i recognize the challenges i have ahead, the reality is, we are faced with generational-defining challenges, everything from china trying to surpass united states as global superpower to inflation that i
reaction. todd: plus, california could be inching closer to becoming the first state to pay reparations. answer my question, what do we want? when? what do we want? reparation. when? now. what do we want? reparation. when? now. what do we want? reparations. todd: dozens of recommendation to compensate black residents are in the hands of state lawmakers. you re watching fox and friends first, i m todd piro. carley: i m carley shimkus. all eyes on the supreme court, justiceslet rule on three cases, including student lone forgiveness program. todd: alexandria hoff. alexandria: the student loan relief plan and lgbtq protection. you have biden v nebraska, questioning authority to issue $20,000 in student loan relief and an artist refused to make wedding website for same-sex couples. supreme court struck down affirmative action yesterday saying it violates equal protection clause under the 14th amendment. the president called the court not normal. is
ju julie banderas , dr. janet nesheiwat and ian prior. we begin with shannon bream, who is live at the supreme court. shannon. shannon: kayleigh, we had talked about student loans and issue was standing, state of missouri had standing to bring this legal challenge and secretary of education went too far using the heroes act to wipe out student loans. the 6-3 opinion, the heroes act gives authority to cancel money for student loans, it does not. the secretary can modify regulatory provision, with the education acts, not to rewrite the statute from the ground up, which is essentially what he did to wipe out the loans. the judge wrote this, the statute read gives secretary broad authority to remove national emergency effect on ability to repay student loan. that 6-3 split did not see this the same way. this affects billions in student loans. the president and other democrats suggested, i don t think he had authority to do this and supreme court agreed. lori smiths, free speech