One or two cases. what s more common that jim alluded to a second ago is that these organizations that fuall out of favor where difficulty getting visas for their journalists. bloomberg has problems. the new york times has that problem. one reporter in hong kong spent a year trying to get into the mainland where his family are and so i think that s one problem. also bloomberg and the new york times are blocked in china. you can t access their websites. so there are ways the authorities try to make your life more difficult but in terms of actual expulsions, its an aggressive move in the communist party holding back from doing that because of negative press that they will receive. jim, you want to jump in. give us your response. the biggest picture here is from western perspective chinese communist government is hurting itself by making it hard for reporters to travel there. the unbalanced picture from inside china is more positive
U.s. in just the last sixth weeks. they clearly made a decision. we don t care what the backlash is going to be. we know a lot of people are going to get killed. but we re going to go ahead and do this. they tried, this is an experiment in restoring democracy. they clearly weren t that interested in fostering that relationship. the money they are getting from outside the u.s. is ten times the size. at the end, washington will need cairo. they need the to protect israel. they have chosen to not listen. i m curious if you think that democracy can thrive there? do you think it it can work? from western perspective, to look at that place culturally and historically, can it work the way we think it should work? it s terrible to think they can t have elections. they had elections. i covered them.