Didn t actually know what wikileaks had. as you pointed out in your interview with stone, there is no charge in the indictment that stone, who is facing seven felony charges, was in any kind of a criminal conspiracy with wikileaks. all this is about is the process of investigating the so-called trump-russia conspiracy, which it seems to me not only didn t exist, but they have long known it didn t exist. tucker: i m fixated on the cnn tape of this raid on stone s house this morning because i think, like a lot of people, i looked at that and i thought, this is not at all the country that i grew up in or want to live in. if a prosecutor says we go to the house of a 66-year-old man who we know doesn t have a passport or a gun, who lives with his older wife who is deaf and their dogs and cats and we need 27 armed federal agents, each with a side arm and an ar-15, is
Wear stone down financially, make sure he is broke so he has to plead guilty to these charges, even though he didn t commit them. and then try to flip me against the president. i m facing $2 million now in potential legal fees. people can go to stone defense fund.com to help me. stone defense fund.com. i m in for the fight of my life. i will not quit. i will not fold. i will not bend. i will not bear false witness against the president. i intend to fight because this indictment is fabricated. this indictment is thin as can be. my attorneys are highly confident that they can win an acquittal. if i can get a fair trial in the district of columbia. tucker: what are the potential consequences you face? what are your lawyers telling you they will push for in terms of the sentence? it s impossible to say. they have not yet had discussion. the only other thing i do want to say is the fbi
Show at infowars, a the efforts to silence alex jones, who is one of my greatest supporters and proponents, are part of this war. so, i intend to plead not guilty. i believe i will be vindicated. it s funny to watch preet bharahra on cnn say this is a oslam dunk, calls me a liar. here is a guy who a judge lashed for lying in the william walton case. you are the liar, preet. watching the lawyers jump to conclusions, tucker saying oh, well, the trump campaign official who directed stone to find out about wikileaks was donald trump. no, it was not. there are several things in here in the indictment that are simply not true. tucker: who was it if it wasn t the president? well, i have to speculate about that. since it never happened, it appears to me that they have composed testimony for someone. perhaps rick gates, perhaps steve bannon. perhaps someone is bearing false witness against me. but knowing what s in my
One famous neocon summed it up this way, given his proclivities, maybe roger stone would enjoy prison. get it? stone may get raped behind bars. how awesome is that? so how should the rest of us people who aren try spending our lives on twitter feel about what happened this morning?wo n is america safer? notca if you believed in the russia collusion story we still haven t caught those villains. two years in, still no evidence at all that any american committed an actual crime during the 2016 election. roger stone, for example, stands accused of misdeeds committed long after the votes were counted.ha his alleged crimes arose when investigation into otherer crimes we have not yet found. the charges against stone include obstruction of proceedings, witness tampering, five counts of lying to congress. the core of it, of the charges, is that stone mischaracterized his conversations with the left wing talk radio host called
Wear stone down financially, make sure he is broke so he has to plead guilty to these charges, even though he didn t commit them. and then try to flip me against the president. i m facing $2 million now in potential legal fees. people can go to stone defense fund.com to help me. stone defense fund.com. i m in for the fight of my life. i will not quit. i will not fold. i will not bend. i will not bear false witness against the president. i intend to fight because this indictment is fabricated. this indictment is thin as can be. my attorneys are highly confident that they can win an acquittal. if i can get a fair trial in the district of columbia. tucker: what are the potential consequences you face? what are your lawyers telling you they will push for in terms of the sentence? it s impossible to say. they have not yet had discussion. the only other thing i do want to say is the fbi