things are subject to change. at some point in the future. but when you hear the west what the west says, not just president biden, but others, they say, these are the things we can t do without risking a wider war. and i guess the question i have for you is whether you think, as you look at the way this war is unfolding right now, whether a wider war is inevitable in order to save ukraine? so, thank you so much for the question. my first answer would be, can you tell me what s the difference between providing ukraine with stingers that shot down the helicopters and providing us with jets that shoot down the jets? we already have javelins. we have stingers. and when putin came to know that we might get the jets, he started dictating the west, the u.s. and nato countries like poland, that this shouldn t be done. but to be honest, we already had the weapons to shoot down some of the aircrafts like helicopters. we already have more than 50 we have 86 jets that we already
streets, there have been signs of protest on their state media newscasts. i understand that even access through telegram to news from the outside world is starting to contract in that country. but also, you know, you re there. you tell me. i mean, what i have come to understand in the last three weeks about the ukrainian people is that this could have the opposite effect. the emotional targets will deepen the emotional commitment to making sure that russia loses this war. reporter: yeah, there s a reason i m sharing with you the story of this medic, because people are rallying around this. her nickname is taira and free taira is starting to trend here. it is absolutely having the opposite effect. i ordered a coffee, i turned to the person next to me and i said, what do you think about giving up ukraine? she said, after this, nato s going to want to join us. instead of us joining nato, nato s going to come to this country and want to join us because we have the weapons, we re on the f
how is it possible when we told you that the russians were preparing weapons and troops and we knew that we were preparing they were preparing for war but all you cared was the economy. ukraine s president zelenskyy invoked the holocaust accusing germany of prioritizing economic ties with russia. we re back with jack and simon. i don t know if anyone s done it yet. i trust one of you will. the zelenskyy speeches have been they have been powerful, purposeful, poetic. i m guessing. you tell me. channelling the growing anger and desperation of the ukrainian people. and abilities as a showman and actor. he was a professional actor
the war and won t forestall a chemical strike if the russians choose to go in that direction. we need to signal that this would be an escalation that could frankly compel nato and the west to establish a no-fly zone or to strike russian targets responsible for the chemical weapons. similar to the previous administration did. it is not enough to expose the russian wrongdoing and not prerogative towards a broader world war or a broader confrontation between russia and nato. this can be just indicating that we are serious. this is a threshold that we can t tolerate. biological weapons or nuclear weapons against another country especially by russia against agreement when ukraine gave up the nuclear weapons. russia was supposed to be a
talking about in ukraine and that is they ll take help from whomever and wherever and why the address to the german parliament. you saw foreign fighters flooding into the country. yeah. there s assistance from all over the world. there s aid coming through and big convoys which is how i got in. there s a whole lot of military aid coming in. a dozen or more flights a day with massive american c-17 cargo planes bringing just stuffed with weapons going to ukraine and as colonel vindman said there s many different ways to close the skies by providing them with the missiles that the u.s. has and that s happening. being on the border one thing i saw is the u.s. and allies are already entering this war with