have been, up to date. very few people accept it. my theory is the earth at the beginning the biologists in particular were particular felt that it was in some ways anti darwin, which it wasn t in any way. mmm. it complied entirely in agreement with darwin s great ideas. and it took a long time before they swung round. and the trouble is, science is too divided up. universities, for their own reasons, have separated it into a whole series of different subjects, so that physicists know damn all about biology most of them and biologists very little about physics or geology or anything else. they just stick with their own subject. and that s no way to understand it, and we ve got to change it.
at the beginning the biologists in particular were particular felt that it was in some ways anti darwin, which it wasn t in any way. mmm. it complied entirely in agreement with darwin s great ideas. and it took a long time before they swung round. and the trouble is, science is too divided up. universities, for their own reasons, have separated it into a whole series of different subjects, so that physicists know damn all about biology most of them and biologists very little about physics or geology or anything else. they just stick with their own subject. and that s no way to understand it, and we ve got to change it. when i last spoke to you, which was more than a decade ago, i came away feeling that while you were anxious that we humans were not doing enough to address the challenge
that it was in some ways anti darwin, which it wasn t in any way. mmm. it complied entirely in agreement with darwin s great ideas. and it took a long time before they swung round. and the trouble is, science is too divided up. universities, for their own reasons, have separated it into a whole series of different subjects, so that physicists know damn all about biology most of them and biologists very little about physics or geology or anything else. they just stick with their own subject. and that s no way to understand it, and we ve got to change it. when i last spoke to you, which was more than a decade ago, i came away feeling that while you were anxious that we humans were not doing
my theory is the earth at the beginning the biologists in were felt that it was in some ways anti darwin, which it wasn t in any way. mmm. it complied entirely in agreement with darwin s great ideas. and it took a long time before they swung round. and the trouble is, science is too divided up. universities, for their own reasons, have separated it into a whole series of different subjects, so that physicists know damn all about biology most of them and biologists very little about physics or geology or anything else. they just stick with their own subject. and that s no way to understand it, and we ve got to change it. when i last spoke to you, which was more than a decade ago, i came away feeling that while you were anxious that we humans were not doing
at the beginning. the biologists in particular were. felt that it was in some ways anti darwin, which it wasn t in any way. mm. it complied entirely in agreement with darwin s great ideas. and it took a long time before they swung round. and the trouble is, science is too divided up. universities, for their own reasons, have separated it into a whole series of different subjects so that physicists know damn all about biology, most of them, and biologists very little about physics or geology or anything else. they just stick with their own subject. and that s no way to understand it, and we ve got to change it. when i last spoke to you, which was more than a decade ago, i came away feeling that, while you were anxious that we humans were not doing enough to address the challenge of climate change, that