Last word. The gentleman is recognized. I yield to the Ranking Member. The gentle lady from california misstieated somethin that i addressed head on last night. Undersecretary stated this was perspective money, it was not interfering and dealing with this issue. For those of us who have been in a war, people die in a war zone. This money did not cause that. Thank you, reclaiming my time. Mr. Chairman, the biggest difference in the clinton impeachment and this one is that president clinton committed a crime, perjury. This president isnt even accused of committing a crime. The constitution is pretty clear on what constitutes an impeachable defense, treason, bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors. Its not, or whatever else nancy pelosi and adam schiff deem impeachable. I think we can all agree that no president should abuse the powers of his or her office, just like the chairman of the House Committee shouldnt abuse
the powers of his office to obtain and publish the Phone Records
Mr. Chairman. What purpose ir trying the last word. The gentleman strikes the lastem word. Recognized. Thank you. I yield to the rankingst member just real quickly, the gent thely lady from california stat something irn addressed head on last night. Undersecretary haleig said it w perspective money, not interfering or dealing with the issue. For those of us who have been in a war zone people do die. This money did not stop that. That is something that cannot be continuedme to perpetrated on ts world. Reclaiming my time. Theec difference in the Clinton Impeachment and this one, president clinton committed a crime, perjury, this president isnt accused of committing a crime. The constitution is prettymi clr on what constitution impeachable offense, treason, bribery and other High Crimes And Misdemeanors. Its not treason, bribery, other High Crimes And Misdemeanors and adam schiff an nancy pelosi deem impeachable. No president should abuse the
powers of his or her office like the chairman
them say today can be pretty much categorized into three areas. first, it s either stuff people presumed and had no direct evidence of, kind of their water cooler theory of the case. second, it s hearsay. somebody told somebody told somebody else that created some concern about the president s conduct. or, it is reflective of a sincere policy, this agreement about how to make the ukraine great again. i heard all these folks come by their part of the diplomatic core and they seem to believe that we ought do everything for the ukraine but if the president disagrees with that it is not impeachable conduct. essentially they re alleging a shakedown but i think most americans know that you cannot have a shakedown if the person allegedly being shook down doesn t even know about the shakedown. you have president zelensky himself saying i felt no pressure. and then, talk about bad timing, we got this time article that comes out on the 10th of december because their theory of
hear them say today can be categorized into three areas. first, it s either stuff people presumed and had no direct evidence of. their water cooler theory of the case. second, it s hearsay, somebody told some body sold somebody else that created concerns about the president s conduct or a sincere policy disagreement how to make ukraine great again. the diplomatic corps seem to think we need to do everything for ukraine but if the president disagrees with it. they re alleging a shakedown. i think most americans know you can t have a shakedown if the person allegedly being shook down doesn t even know about the shakedown. you have president zelensky himself saying i felt no pressure. and then talk about bad timing. we got this time article that comes out on the 10th of december just a few days ago because their theory of the
without opening the investigation that seems to be so troubling to democrats. everything you re going to hear them say could be categorized into three areas. first, it s stuff people presumed and had no direct evidence of. their water cooler theory of the case. second hearsay, somebody told somebody told somebody else that created some concern about the president s conduct, or a policy disagreement about how to make the ukraine great again. i heardea the folks come by, pa of the diplomatic core, we ought to do everything for the ukraine but if the president disaemployees with that, it is not impeachable conduct. they re alleging a shakedown. i think most americans know that you cannot have a shakedown if the person being shook down doesn t know about the shakedown. you have president zelensky himself saying i felt no pressure. talk about bad timing. this time article on the 10th