Authority to enter any kind of mask mandate, even if the numbers went up astronomically, it is about the authority of the cdc, not the merits of the decision. i want to read to you with the washington post roe in regard to the judge who issued this ruling, quote, trump s judges have embodied his perspective on the american system of government, which is that there is nothing inherently worthwhile about any of it. there are no principles worth adhering to, know systems that should command respect, and no rules worth obeying if you don t like the outcome those rules produce. do you share that concern? i don t know that i want to lump all of them together. i m aware of some judges who i believe to be very fine judges. i do think that in this instance, it does seem that the judge expressed hostility towards the authority of the cdc and other administrative agencies. there has been some push by some conservative judges against what is sometimes
i think that in light of this court ruling right now, we have to get a judge to grant relief. they could do that if they decided to appeal and were able to get an injunction lifted. on appeal, so that in the interim, it could exist. but i think that if this judges order is allowed to stick, the authority to enter any kind of mask mandate, even if the numbers went up astronomically, it is about the authority of the cdc, not the merits of the decision. i want to read to you with the washington post roe in regard to the judge who issued this ruling, quote, trump s judges have embodied his perspective on the american system of government, which is that there is nothing inherently worthwhile about any of it. there are no principles worth adhering to, know systems that should command respect, and no rules worth obeying if you don t like the outcome those rules produce. do you share that concern?