and who are in here legitimately. it will also have to do something about making this less look like a religious ban. the aclu guest you had on before was just wrong when he said you can t base categories on religion. in 1944, we passed the war refugee act. that was designed explicitly to save jews from the holocaust. if we had a statute or executive order that specified saving christians or kurds, that would be okay. when you have a secular purpose for a religious classification, that doesn t violate the establishment clause. it s only if your purpose is to promote a particular religion and to establish that particular religion. so i do think that the trump administration will and can win a victory.
1944 we passed the war refugee act which specifically was designed to rescue a hundred thousand jews and everybody knew the purpose was to rescue jews, that didn t establish judaism as the state religion of the united states. i think the establishment argument will fail in the supreme court. i think the standing arguments may fail in the supreme court. so they have won a very, very solid preliminary victory. i think they ll win if they taken a argument to the supreme court. by the way, if they re smart, they won t appeal this to the supreme court, they ll wait for a case from another circuit which may come out the other way. then there s a 4-4 split in the supreme court it goes in favor of the trump administration rather than against them which the ninth circuit opinion is likely to do. but i don t think logic is prevailing in the white house or in the justice department these days. they re not getting good legal advice. they re not following subtle sophisticated legal proceedings, the
people should be protected doesn t establish christianity. go back to the 1940s when we passed the war refugee act, which focused on rescuesing jus from hitler s genocide. it focused on jews because they were the victims. is lap uk islamic terrorism in the world. i think the trump will get the most substanceively but they will lose. they need to go back and write one that will survive constitutional attack. i agree, i m not sure the government will necessarily go to the supreme court if they
states, does not establish christianity or the fact that you say that minority religious people should be protected doesn t establish christianity. go back to the 1940s when we passed the war refugee act, which focused on rescuesing jus from hitler s genocide. it focused on jews because they were the victims. is lap uk islamic terrorism in the world. i think the trump will get the most substanceively but they will lose. they need to go back and write one that will survive constitutional attack. i agree, i m not sure the government will necessarily go to the supreme court if they
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20170209:00:05:00 comparemela.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from comparemela.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.