This vox.com guy, perhaps he has some sort of comedic license because he s a comedian, but i didn t laugh about it. but where do you draw the line? he didn t violate the standards, but he was harmful to community. no one knows what youtube means anymore. how do you see it? of k course. youtube is just using this as an excuse to declare all-out war on conservatives. they admit that crowder did not violate any of the rules, they said they were going to leave his videos up, then vox.com launched another campaign, and they said they were going to demonetize him and taking away videos. youtube is going after all conservatives, and the timing is not coincidental. this was not some exasperated frustration from the vox.com journalist. this was a premedicated, calculated campaign to take conservatives off of youtube. it occurred two days before pride month began and before the first democratic presidential debate. what this is going to lead to is as the 2020 race heats up,
Of the party? yes, he is the president of the united states. presidents of the united states control their party. good, bad or indifferent, over history, they re in control. even a weak president like jimmy carter who was challenged for renomination. by god, he got that nomination a second time over ted kennedy who was supposedly so incredibly popular. this is donald trump s party today. one of the lines that steve bannon said, i want to get this right, we are a nation with a culture and a reason for being. i m wondering how you interpret it, how you heard that. i mean, i go back to the steve bannon that said on the cpac stage today someone that embraced that he was a conservative is very jarring to me. this is the same person who waged war on conservatives in the republican party. the same person that has fought and then stoked these divisions is extremist language when it comes to people of color, women, jewish people, muslims. so i think what steve bannon was