There was an agreement between one or more persons to achieve the object of the conspiracy and that was set forth in the indictment. The government is really going to set forth a pretty narrow number of charges here and frankly, it would not be unexpected if they had a convention on some and not others conviction. It is frankly expected in these types of cases. The indictment in these types of cases. The indictment is in these types of cases. The indictment is also in these types of cases. The indictment is also mentioned six Co Conspirators, none have been charged in this indictment. For attorneys, a former Department Of Justice official at a political us to leave i consulted who aided trumps efforts. Why do you think they were not charged . Trumps efforts. Why do you think they were not charged . Thats a good cuestion. I they were not charged . Thats a good question i was they were not charged . Thats a good question. I was expecting they were not charged . Thats a good question. I w
Inferiorjury being picked, and so i think it is possible to do that and a fairjury. it all depends on the process to pick thatjury, the questions that are asked of those juries, the potentialjurors, the questions that are asked to make sure eachjuror enters questions that are asked to make sure each juror enters into that courtroom without any bias any prejudice of without any notions, and the ability to decide the case based on only evidence that is presented to them, and, frankly, i think that could happen in any jurisdiction in the united states. it is all about the selection of the jurors and making sure of the integrity of that process. it integrity of that process. it certainly looks like we ll get a different picture between these different picture between these different indictments and trials that take place, perhaps even another indictment in the state of georgia. we know that could be coming down in the coming weeks, but ijust want to coming down in the coming weeks, but
Stage. if for no other against only donald trump at this stage. if for no other reason - against only donald trump at this stage. if for no other reason thenj stage. if for no other reason then it would stage. if for no other reason then it would he stage. if for no other reason then it would be more stage. if for no other reason then it would be more expeditious - stage. if for no other reason then it would be more expeditious to i stage. if for no other reason then . it would be more expeditious to get to trial it would be more expeditious to get to trial of it would be more expeditious to get to trial of men it would be more expeditious to get to trial of men having it would be more expeditious to get to trial of men having to it would be more expeditious to get to trial of men having to deal - it would be more expeditious to get to trial of men having to deal with l to trial of men having to deal with six or to trial of men having to deal with six or so to trial of
Through an attorney. so sarah, how important are these conditions and that they are also followed? so those are all pretty standard conditions. i think the complexity here is the scope of the witness list and the government side. and the fact that some of those individuals are likely very close to trump, and so trump s t may try to push back on some of those restrictions if they want to continue some of those relationships or they may abide by those restrictions. we will have to see. but i think generally those are restrictions you would see in most cases of this type, nothing too out of the ordinary there. of the ordinary there. david, your thoughts? of the ordinary there. david, your thoughts? you of the ordinary there. david, your thoughts? you know, of the ordinary there. david, your thoughts? you know, i of the ordinary there. david, your thoughts? you know, i don t- of the ordinary there. david, your. thoughts? you know, i don t really know what more thoughts? you know,
Latter requires that the case be brought in the venue where the conduct underlying the case occurred. and so in some instances, in some cases, that can be more than one spot, in other cases, there is only one location where that case can be brought, and so there is a process by which venue can be changed if it is absolutely impossible for an individual to get a fair trial impossible for an individual to get a fairtrial in impossible for an individual to get a fair trial in a particular location, but in the neck it is very hard to do that, and the most appropriate for a case in my view, putting on both my former prosecutor hat and my defence attorney hat, for a case to be brought in the location where the conduct underlying that case occurred, that location has the strongest public interest in the case being brought there. bryan, what is your case being brought there. bryan, what is your thought case being brought there. bryan, what is your thought on - case being brought there. brya