threatened to respond and dramatic ways of speaker pelosi does stop in taiwan. what is the white house saying? not much apparently. at least not publicly, griff jenkins joins us live from outside the white house with more, griff? nothing much at all. the president has been monitoring that trip while isolating in the residence here. the doctor releasing a new letter saying he isn t feeling well and maintaining a strict isolation measures. although he added this the president continues to be very conscientious to protect any of the executive residence. white house secret service and other staff whose duties require social distance proximity to him for the white house also telling us today, the present has six close contacts and none have tested positive for this after questions have been arising over how strictly he adhered to the cdc guidelines after insane unmasked several public appearances recently. this comes as tensions are rising with china with all eyes on a possible
it strange. and the department and fbi took a petty sophomoric wipe at kash patel, you may recall doj didn t want the affidavit released even with redactredaction because of purpose dangers to agents and witnesses, then they left cash patel s name un kash patel s name unredacted. there by, releasing the name of a witness. we wonder why there is a double standard. some of the dp documents are alleged to be very highly classified. new york and d c media calling for president trump s indictment, on the one hand, good to know there are still crimes liberal media personalties think should be persecuted. if you a contempt eighth a former president. there the president take the personal documents from the white house or did someone else pack the boxes? when did trump learn who was taken? did they knowingly withhold documents after being asked to return them, was there a good faith disagreement on what had to be legally returned. when is why did negotiations break down. what classif
prosecutors mainly undeterred by rising crime, he is undeterred by you, the people who have to live with his soft on crime ideas, he continues to think that letting people get away with crime is good, prison bad and people should be realized time after time to continue their criminal ways, he is willing to to spend a lot of money to find ideas to not make you safer. your vote counts as much as his does. it is not too late. soros does not need good cops pro prosecutors, he will be fine on whatever yacht he is on, we need the public safety, what of the policy initiatives doing to your communities, former federal prosecutor, sol weisenberg is joining us now. i am guessing george soros figured out the best way to change your justice system is to change those responsible for running it there true, if you put enough money into the races. he put a tremendous aim in the local da races, someone has to pay the piper. what is happening now people are waking up to the results of ease ele
unfair and biased. 85% of us, democrats, republicans and independents do not trust the print and television media. note it is not just republicans, but everyone, 85% of us. the either 15% either work in media or live under a rock or both. having no confidence in the fairness of media may be single most unifying thing we have going for us, when everyone thinks you are wrong, that should be calls for self reflection. but not for the media, they don t blame themselves, they blame you and the internet and lack of diversity, except a lack of political diversity. the questions are two-fold, why have we lost trust in the media? why does it matter. the first question is easy, public does not trust media and believe that media is area because it is not fair. it tries to influence who is in power. our country is split 50/50, but the poll is 85/15. most still value and recognize fairness. a country and a culture cannot survive without fairness. we need a referee, a detached judge, the
safety concerns for witnesses or it could impact on going investigations. prosecutors have until thursday to propose redactions, then the judge will decide whether they are reasonable. there are a couple things worth thinking about between now and then, even if we see the affidavit, it is just one side of the argument, the government s side. the target of the search doesn t get to appear in front of the judge or argue. the information has not been cross examined. secondly. it takes probable cause to search, but it takes a lot more than that to convict. whatever is affidavit may wind out to be true or certain. only the government participates in seeking a search warrant, we don t know and we won t know until both sides present their facts and test the echedz on evidence on the other side, we should ask ourselves why? why do we want to read the affidavit? how will it help us arrive at the truth? do we arrive at the facts. credible evidence is to move us to persuade us, can we s