to render judgment r on the unprecedented moral atrocities our leadership class has committed over the past twos years. the shameless lying, shamelthe arrogance, the stupid the total incompetence, the unfairness, the relentless and vicious racism toward the majority of the americans rm population, all of whichlation. together amount to, yes, attacks on democracy itself. if you believed in democracy, you would not act like this. dec no one has ever run a developed country with this degree of recklessness. puniquestion is , is anyone ever going to be punished for it? that s what s really on the ballot. this november eight . so for republicans, the election should be easy. nothing you should ever for a second underestimate their ability to screw it up anyway they may. but the template formber success is right in front of them. just run against joe biden. there may be people out thererug who feel sorry for joe biden, pl but there s absolutely nobody who thinks or can arguo feeled
condolences to your community. i know you spoke with president biden last night, i believe. what was his message to you in that call? i did. well, he was very gracious and obviously offered his condolences for our community and just offered any help that he could give. and i appreciated that very much. you said in the wake of this shooting that there are days where it feels like you re going backwards to some degree, the community and the country is to some degree going backwards. how big of a shock has this been to the community? unfortunately, i d say it hasn t been much of a shock, phil. this is something that happens all tooof often and have a violt gun problem in our community and country, we know that. we also have a problem with racism and i think that every step on the path that we take either is a step toward more
donald trump is wrong. ll and i can no longer support him at all as a presidential candidate, as an american citizen, that was the tamest of? what you said. but what aboutli thake trut? like, trump comes out and says,s you know what looks like it wasn kind of doing it in jest, but saying, well, they can install me or have a new election orrtin was that was at subvertingnstitu the constitution? i wasn tit even i followinn her argument is here. i mean, i think what we ve seenn when we have the fbi working ams with big tech to censor americans, that is about as against gainst the constitutn as you can get is a clear firstt amendment violation. violt not evennd understanding where she s going. well, miranda, i always find it rich whenfind the democrats e saying we care about i the constitution, what they want to invent rightsnv i, the constitution that don t exist. they want to eviscerate the second amendment, the firs t amendment, as mike says, meanss really nothing unlessg their vie
going to bring back education in the state of michigan. it has been decimated by this governor . 38th in the thirty eighth in the nation and then she kept our kids out of school. but then w e heard the department of ed is trying to keep secrets from parents t and teach and gender . parents across the state of michigan are mad . you ve been talking about crime . that s a top issue for people in michigan, too, under gretchen whitmer, we started as 14 violent, most violent crime. now we re ninth mosto hide violt crime in the country and the economy. to oe got to reduce regulations and bring businesses back to our state. businesses are leaving. . you ve seen ford leave the state of michigan. so that politicizing the schools, is that something you think voters in michigan are aware of? absolutely. you are even seeing the votersg in dearborn, michigan, you re seeing families across the state that are saying, whoae saying w, whoa, wait a mie do not want this and gender in our schools. we
90s we did not include violent felonies and they amended it to include covering violent felonies. as a matter of fact there is a three-pronged test that fouave to go through in order for them to call ice. so i said to the supervisor who did it, i m not going to agree to thatecause the did come to me as the original author and ask me do i agree with adding violent felons and i said of course i don t agree with adding violt felons. that s ridiculous. the concept is to protect families, never to protect violent felons. it so when i did this ordinance a month ago, there was quite a bit of hysteria. all of the supervisors and the mayor of the city and the city attorney and the. got on the iconic steps of san francisco city hall and called me all sorts of names and said this was