kind of felt a bit to me like jam tomorrow from the chancellor. saying what he wants to do but not necessarily what he s going to do. let s chat this over with ali mirage, who i am glad to sayjoins me, a columnist for the article. ali, what do you think, do we know much more about rishi sunak today compared to what we knew yesterday? i think this was soon at the smooth, the sequeh i think this was soon at the smooth, the sequel. you have the james bond -esque the sequel. you have the james bond esque video sequence, very slick, and then esque video sequence, very slick, and then rishi sunak had to things really and then rishi sunak had to things really to and then rishi sunak had to things really to do in the speech, it wasn t really to do in the speech, it wasn t the soaring rhetoric we expect wasn t the soaring rhetoric we expect from the likes of william hague expect from the likes of william hague or expect from the likes of william hague or that cameron did in 2007
Interview d Aryeom dessinatrice de marmottes (mais pas que)
linuxfr.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from linuxfr.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Neue Blender-Version 2 92: Modellieren mit Knoten
heise.de - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from heise.de Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
stupid and nonsense, the poor the edited step it leaves out critical context. we went back. we looked at the entire video sequence and it was agitated. he did leave out context. for example, the filmmaker did not show the clerk talking to michael brown, clearly debating whether to make or trade for whatever he had put on the counter. the film maker did not show the clerk taking back the sodas and the cigars and putting them back on their shelves. the lawyer at the convenience store says brown tried to barter but he failed. listen to him. this is the argument that is going on between michael brown and the clerks. what do you mean? you want to barter with me? what you mean i can trade with you? why not? come on, man. the language got heated and it got ugly. the filmmaker stands by his claim that the footage would have changed the narrative that michael brown was shot after robbing a convenience store. police say it irrelevant because
the edited step it leaves out critical context. we went back. we looked at the entire video sequence and it was agitated. he did leave out context. for example, the filmmaker did not show the clerk talking to michael brown, clearly debating whether to make or trade for whatever he had put on the counter. the film maker did not show the clerk taking back the sodas and the cigars and putting them back on their shelves. the lawyer at the convenience store says brown tried to barter but he failed. listen to him. this is the argument that is going on between michael brown and the clerks. what do you mean? you want to barter with me? what you mean i can trade with you? why not? come on, man. the language got heated and it got ugly. the filmmaker stands by his claim that the footage would have changed the narrative that michael brown was shot after robbing a convenience store. police say it irrelevant because the officer didn t stop go burn