younger people, unvaccinated younger people. so anything we can do to improve vaccination rates, including going to below the age of 18, clearly will be a good thing. to get as many people vaccinated as possible, with both doses of the vaccine, so when we going into the autumn and winter period, we have as much protection as possible. this would be, assuming this goes ahead, vaccinating 16 and 17 year olds, about reducing immunity transmission and the benefits that would bring, rather than necessarily protecting the health of those 16 and 17 year olds, because as we have just seen from that latest research, younger people not really suffering significant effects from coronavirus. i significant effects from coronavirus. significant effects from coronavirus. ~ , . coronavirus. i think it s quite a comlex coronavirus. i think it s quite a complex equation. coronavirus. i think it s quite a complex equation. definitely l coronavirus. i think it s quite a i complex equation. definitely
lawyers will argue vigorously, i m sure, that this is not a sustainable argument, that this settlement which was published yesterday is far too widely drawn and cannot possibly be taken to grant the kind of immunity that andrew s lawyers will contend that it does. but either way, this is a very importantand, undoubtedly, a very difficult moment for queen elizabeth s second son. and if the ruling does go his way, we don t know when we re going to get it, but if it does go his way, what would that mean for prince andrew? i mean, is there a way for him back into public life? i think people would find that pretty difficult. it may, as you say, be some days before we get a ruling, or we may get one at the end of the proceedings today. but we now know in the case of prince andrew that he associated with notjust one, but two convicted sex offenders.