effect, said supreme court critics won t intimidate justices. associated press, clarence thomas criticizes judges for veering into politics. i think that s problematic. business insider, i mean, it goes on and on. so, if they re so happy to finally have their day to overturn roe vs. wade, to, i don t know, do their right-wing thing, why are they freaking out so publicly? i think this is perhaps a case of thou doth protest too much. they realize that the public sees what is going on. in the case of justice barrett, she was giving this speech, saying that the justices are not partisan hacks, as she was introduced by mitch mcconnell at the mcconnell center in kentucky. of course, mitch mcconnell is the reason why she is on the bench. justice alito pushed back at this idea that the court is
explore whether there was a possible link. well, tonight, the grand county sheriff s office has announced the two cases are not, not related. bret? bret: jonathan, just to go back, the first part of that you said there is police activity at the laundrie house now? police activity at the laundrie house and so we will give you an update on that as soon as we figure out the details. bret: okay. jonathan serrie in florida with this strange case that we ll continue to follow. thank you. u.s. supreme court justice clarence thomas is criticizing junction for veering into politics. thomas made the comments during a speech at the university of notre dame thursday. justice thomas says it s not the role of judges to make policy or base decision on personal feelings or religious beliefs. i think the court was thought to be the least dangerous branch and we may have become the most dangerous. and i think that s problematic.