sub what will happen, for practical and propaganda reasons, is the same as you always was you go as far as you can go and you pull back again if you think it is practical to do so. does not mean they have given up on invading ukraine, but it looks like you are being a bit more realistic and they will try and leverage it or lease get some time. kevin? it leverage it or lease get some time. kevin? , ., . ., kevin? it is rather convenient, the ve kevin? it is rather convenient, they ve been kevin? it is rather convenient, they ve been going kevin? it is rather convenient, they ve been going at - kevin? it is rather convenient, they ve been going at it - kevin? it is rather convenient, they ve been going at it for - kevin? it is rather convenient, l they ve been going at it for now five weeks, and clearly the expectation was they were to kyiv rather expectation was they were to kyiv rather quickly. that has not happened, they are looking for a bit of an happened, they are looking
here s part of it. the number one rule of wind development does this, the starbucks rule which says never try and cite a wind project within 30 miles of a starbucks coffee shop. ve kevin lives in michigan where he spends a lot of his time fighting industrial wind coprojects. the demographic that is in the willing to pay a premium price for quality coffee is the same demographic that typically has the education and financial wherewithal to organize and resist irresponsible wind projects. we met him at this wind farm in southern michigan, which by the way is a 31 minute drive from the nearest starbucks. people who look at some of these wind proposals figured out quickly that one of the reasons their community is being targeted is it is poor and they are perceived as being desperate for revenue. they think we are a bunch of rubes and hicks out here. since the first american wind farm started spinning in new hampshire and in 1980, the most powerful supporters of so-called gree