needs help there. stunning new report comes from the new york times and details how biden administration is seeking to maintain the president s family man persona before the 2024 election. and it comes just days after hunter biden settled his years long child support case over his estranged 4-year-old daughter. the deal lets hunter off the hook for tens of thousands of child support payments, dollars i should say. it also stops his daughter navy from using biden as a last name. but hunter did agree to give his daughter some of his paintings. well, what more could a little girl want? the new york times headline describes the ordeal as hunter biden s daughter in a tale of two families. and it reads the story surrounding the president s grandchild in arkansas who is not yet met her father or grandfather is about money, politics and what it means to have the biden birth rite. the report goes on to reveal president biden s public image is centered around his devotion to
severe ramifications for weather patterns, food supplies which, in turn, could impact biodiversity, geopolitics and health. my goodness! i hope that note of skepticism prevails. a.o.c. demands something. talib demands something. whatever that is, they give them a report. pack the supreme court. we ll give you a report and lean on the report and say we can t do that. let s give you a report on this geothermal whatever you call it. by the way, what would china do? show up and help with this? let s use it to block the sun on china. let s do that. i don t care. i thought that vitamin d was good for me. that s what my doctor told me. am i mistaken? not at all. china point is a good one. if the biden administration was really concerned about the climate crisis, let s impose costs on one of the greatest emitters of greenhouse gases in the world, china. not just the greatest. the greatest. not greater. it s the worst. precisely. why are we cozying up to the chinese communist party? w
well, i can tell you what, all these universities could do today that would have bipartisan overwhelming majority of support in the united states of america is to get rid of legacy admissions, right? if you want to increase diversity, you don t need the supreme court to get rid of legacy admissions. focus on people from rural backgrounds, from the inner cities and from different socioeconomic factors. that is what perpetuates the cycle of privilege is legacy admissions and if, you know, if you want diversity, every single elite university can do that today. and i think, you know, but when you look at the broader picture here, i love what you had what you were saying about, you know, toning down and the rhetoric. and both parties can be guilty of sort of saying inflammatory things. but, you know, whenever a.o.c. says things about that she s going to subpoena the supreme court, right, or that they re going to pack the court. makes no sense to do this. if you want to pack the court, t
powerful to still be attacking issues separate. america is trash, apparently, the rallying cry. i mean, the rallying cry is let s hate on the supreme court. and go after the justices. and did you listen to a.o.c. talking about impeach. subpoenas? are you kidding me? that s going to come back to bite you, a.o.c., if that s what you want to happen. when it shifts the other way and the court dynamic shifts the other way, basically she s upset because their judgment did not align with her beliefs and her ideology and that s what we keep seeing from the left over and over. the court made a decision i don t like. they re evil. they re corrupt. they re wrong. well, even president biden is backing away from the idea of court packing and i think that s a good thing. kayleigh: that s a good thing. there s this tweet i saw from jamel hill and a woman is before the supreme court and puts up a picture. i told my daughter that today is a big day. they ended affirmative action. isn t it what you
jamel hill, here s her hot take. can t wait until she reads you gladly carried the water for white supremacy and stabbed the folks in the back whose people fought diligently for asian-american rights in america. new york times editorial board zero mentions of asian. it seems like the asian community is just totally forgotten. it does seem like it s overlooked in the debates over affirmative action. listen, tomorrow, we ll celebrate 247 years of this country and, you know, i m a democrat on fox news. we need to turn down the rhetoric, right? you can have legitimate concerns with how cases are decided without attacking the court. i think there are serious concerns about ethics issues. cheryl brings up a.o.c. talking about impeachment. that s the only avenue that congress has to have any kind of accountability over the court. and you have a supreme court that doesn t even subscribe to the same ethics panels and regulations as the rest of the federal judiciary does. i think you can hav