Precedents. the debate is settled. i think fundamentally the debate over same sex marriage for any imaginable future is settled. and the unsellalment around roe, i agree it s not the only reason the supreme court would end up revisiting it, but it is a signal this issue is fundamentally different and that the analogies being drawn to this idea that you re going to have essentially this role of recent decisions and decades-old decisions being rolled back doesn t make any sense. i m curious, if jeffrey, do you think clarence thomas would rule to overturn lebing v. virginia? is this actually an argument that s being advanced? i doubt it. but we re talking about you doubt it. i doubt it, absolutely. but could you say that clarence thomas let s just say clarence thomas can we agree, clarence thomas is not