the constitution does not converse its right or undermine them in any way. i know you don t buy it. respectfully, it s not that i don t buy it but it s intellectually dishonest. you talk about a right to privacy. marriage is not in the constitution. homosexuality is not in constitution. what we know is this court will take the next step. anybody who says they won t just not paying attention. this court is coming after same-sex marriage. this court is coming after brown v board. i mean, with all due respect, i think that s a nonstarter. the idea first of all clarence thomas wants to rule his own marriage is unconstitutional strikes me as unplausible. second, loving is about more of a protection case which ruth bader ginsburg wanted roe in which was at a cost. if this decision ends up being a real decision, big if, it does
president said he would appear before the grand jury. that has never happened, he has been dealing with the kquestion that he is going to submit. i m very skeptical. when he says he answered them very easily, he says he thinks some of them may have been a perjury trap or tripped up. according to his lawyer, some of the questions create more legal more issues for us legally than others. he also said some were unnecessary, unplausible, traps, maybe some of them were ir relevant. are they supposed to be traps. they would never submit written questions that the suspect answers with his lawyer
business associate of paul manafort. it reads like a spy novel. here to unpack it, naveed and julie who wrote and reported on malcolm nance who wrote the plot to hack america. this story, i saw it like okay there is a russian coach in a jail that needs asylum to spill the beans about the kremlin oligarch and the election and there is a video, footage in which she doesn t that maybe unlikely or unplausible. what do you make of it? we re talking about russia so it s totally plausible. let s just be clear for our viewers, she s not just a sex coach but a professional escort. the way this came to light is russian opposition leader released a youtube video that everybody should go see, it has
relief there s a guy called the joker, who is donald trump. sort of a variation on trump, yeah. in a deck of playing cards the only two cards that don t behave properly are the joker and the trump. trump s name is not in the book anyway. i thought i don t want the trump so i ll have the joker instead. there s this cartoon villain running for president. did you watch trump and say to yourself, if i wrote this, people wouldn t believe it? yeah. sometimes trump is stranger than fiction. totally stranger than fiction. i had dinner with my friend, andy mcewen and we agreed if we had presented this as a story to our publishers, they would have said, go away and try harder. we live in a time that is unplausible. there s a broken relationship with reality, you know.
have made this determination about bill clinton who they still like and who, by the way, is not on the ticket. you have to make a transfer to hillary clinton and there are some valid points to be made and i don t think on that debate stage it s working to reach the people you need to reach. go ahead. i don t know what sweeping the leg would have looked like. she knows that if she got the response from him whether she tried to do it or not. he went after bill clinton and had the women in the room and he did everything that could remind people of the sorted past of the clintons and a kind of righteousness as you say that even the media has about donald trump s behavior. i think her strategy has been working very well. let him talk. that s all you have to do. did he stem the hemorrhaging last night? he slightly changed the subject from one that was extremely helpful to him and maybe that helped just a little bit. but at the end of the day it strikes me as unplausible to have a ser