Hes one of the more influential officials in the ukraine, correct . Yes. I believe hes one of the few that stands with lutsenko and the zelensky administration. Yes, thats correct. Look k back at hing back a , hindsight, who was doing what . He was out to get him. He said some nasty things. Sometimes that happens on social media. And are you asking me whether it is appropriate, probably not. But i would say that minister ivankoff has been as well as others both in lutsenko and
zelensky administration have been a good partner to the United States as i think i told you before. Hes a practical man and looking for partners and getting the job done. I am shocked that social media would be the sight of negative comments. You certainly can understand that the president aware of the ministers statement and aware of what mr. Lutsenko was up to and these other elements that we have discussed, there are forms of reasonable bases to wonder why there are influential elements to the ukrainian establ
campaign s team in 2004 traveled to ukraine met with the u.s. ambassador in july. not necessarily. if a member of john kerry s campaign travels to ukraine, would you taken that meeting? i guess it would depend on the purpose of the meeting. that meeting occurred and it was with john holbrok, he met with ukrainian officials and he was there on hiv/aids. we had the official campaign and he s a private citizen meaning of the ambassador the time of the gentleman is expired. it was not unnuusual nofor r giuliani.