big game and so we have a few will: morning treats. pete: what s a dough doughnut? rachel: i don t know but they re good. will: look outrebounded how beay are. if you like doughnuts, that s the way to start your day. pete: i was in the green room with will, he was analyzing analytically each doughnut. will: where would you go, rachel? pete and i went in the same direction, sesame glazed here, whatever that is. pete: it s an interesting combo. rachel: i d go with the thing with the chocolate on top. i like chocolate. will: this? rachel: too much. will: yeah, too much. rachel: right here. will: that s where we went. this is interesting. this is too dry and i don t know what s going on with the red ones but it s the same thing with the blue. rachel: know what i know will: have you tried the blue? rachel: i think it ll go in my teeth. will: thinking ahead on this one. that s smart. rachel: my girls are upstairs in my office. rachel: it s really good. it s a dough doughnut bec
123,000 unread e-mails. will: there you go. rachel: doesn t have me beat. pete: doesn t have rachel beat. pete: that s insane. another e-mail and from virginia, my husband beats will, but not rachel with 73,275 unread e-mails. anne from virginia, we learn add lot more about will s phone in the break. how many voice mails do you think he has unread even astonished you. will: i didn t realize i had this many unread or unlistened to voice mails. i feel like voice mails are a technology of yesterday. like don t leave me a voice mail. there s 660 unheard voice mails. pete: think about that. that s a staggering, staggering number. will: well, let s not do that, i m best at text and there s 29 of those. rachel: i tell my people all the time, if you want to reach me, text me. i say i think that it is co-related with your life. like your life, you don t have time for e-mails and stuff to
that he can sign. and tell me a little bit more about the needs of the people of georgia. you re talking about and i m so grateful to you that you mentioned is what we re doing is on the ground. what are the needs of the people of georgia that you see so underrepresented, so unlistened to. i know it s not a correct word. the needs are great, right? so i will say this. we re still in the middle of a pandemic. the 12 hospitals in rural georgia that have closed or are about to close because of our state legislature s failure to expand medicaid. and part of that is because the laws in georgia make it so that they now are able to invalidate the results of an election, that they don t agree with, right? so the when we think about the 2020 presidential election, and the outcomes of that and how it shocked the country, how it
iraq, benghazi, clinton can now say at the town hall meeting, sure, knew about this stuff, i have been there, but on the other hand, neither iraq nor benghazi has turned out exactly well and she wasn t in charge of the policy at the time, correct? there are even these ridiculous ideas being floated online this afternoon that this capture in libya is somehow tied in some way to this book tour. that s crazy. that s just plain crazy. but the fact that you just spoke to a mother of one of the americans that died and the fact that she still has questions for hillary clinton speaks volumes. i think what hillary clinton would say to that mother, not to that mother, i think what clinton would say in general is what she said before, which is there s a difference between unanswered questions and unlistened-to answers. how do you say that to the mother of one of those four americans? i think she s probably thinking right now this afternoon about what to say in this town hall meeting. can you
questions as to what happened and why it is. let me ask you about that, you say that they are tough questions but she says this is nothing new to learn and writes in the chapter there is a tough friends between unanswered questions and unlistened to answers. let s put it out there: what questions do you have for clinton about benghazi and what does she get wrong in this chapter? first, i don t understand how from the very beginning the c.i.a. and our intelligence said immediately this was al qaeda but in the book she continued i to use this line of logic that because there is no evidence the video didn t play a role, thereafter, the evidence is it could have played a role. if you look at what has been put on paper and what the reports have now said, without question, al-qaeda was involved, how is it she could be the secretary of state in the