Latest Breaking News On - Union building contractors - Page 1 : comparemela.com
If each project was in the plan requires its own environmental analysis what is the e. I. R. We are approving today . The zoning. You are approving the change in zoning. Allowable uses as well as the height. That is the short version of that. Consumif this board decides e more house nugth housing and exd the house you go in the current plan what would happen . So each specific project would be evaluated and determined to through that evaluation we look at whether or not it would result in any new Significant Impact. Whether or not the amount of housing versus jobs that we projected would occur in the e. I. R. Happens as we projected or if the balance shifts to more housing versus less jobs, what we are analyzing the environmental effects of those. There is no cap on the amount of Housing Units or job growth, but what we are analyzing is the environmental effect from that. If we certify it is complete and adequate but we decide as a need for the city we need to build more house you go i
CaliforniaUnited-statesTogoStocktonOaklandSan-franciscoIndia-basinChristy-wongLeo-snodgrassJonathan-berkJenny-smithJoe-foxCalifornia Industry Association versus bay area air Quality Management 2015 Supreme Court case. That case addressed the question of whether an agency is subject to sequa. If they are required to analyze the impact. The court held that agencies are not generally required to analyze the impact of existing environmental conditions on a projects future. If the proposed project risks exacerbating those preexisting environmental hazards or conditions they must analyze the impact of the hazards on the future residents or users. The principal is that it requires analysis of the project impact on the environment as opposed to the Environment Impact on the project. Let me try a hypothetical for you if you there are professional that write and talk about this. If the weight of construction could exacerbate earthquake fault activity, would that not then require further analysis under sequa . If there were information that the project would exacerbate an existing hazard, yes that should be address
CaliforniaUnited-statesTogoStocktonOaklandSan-franciscoIndia-basinJoe-foxLeo-snodgrassJames-faheySteve-williamsMarie-harrisonUnacceptable and we are still using that as measure, then we might say as in relation to what supervisor kim is saying the job to housing ratio is not where we want it. If we were to say at this time and place in San Francisco we think the job to housing ratio is skewed and not correct, it seems as though we are using this measure to keep us at the same level of being unacceptable or not desirable. Yet that is the measure we are using, and must we use that measure our do we ever in i am sorry i am so new to this and asking these questions. Are we able within the guidelines to look at aspirational levels of job to housing ratio . Supervisor fewer, i want to clarify, we responded to the concerns about the job housing balance in relation to the concerns brought up by the appellants regarding gentrification and displacement. Those are not generally addressed unless they can be related to physical environmental effect. We find no physical environmental effects are from plan. That is a polic
CaliforniaUnited-statesTogoStocktonNorth-beachOaklandSan-franciscoIndia-basinChristy-wongLeo-snodgrassJonathan-berkJenny-smith