Thing to me is that he is not reported the one of the unindicted coconspirators federally, meaning that jack smith did not think that he had enough to really sort of lay out his role in the current d.c. case. i think with respect to the unindicted coconspirators, the six, i think basically they will be charged by jack smith. it s just a question of when, not if. but with respect to meadows, i think if i had to guess to see what his good lawyers are doing, is to kind of help jack smith. he might want him as a witness. knowing jack smith, i think he is saying, look it, if you re got wants to cooperate, he s pleading guilty. i am not giving immunity to the chief of staff of the united states to engage in a coup, so i don t care if it helps in the mar-a-lago case, it does not
Meadows story interact with himself? he is indicted in georgia, not indicted by jack smith in washington for much of the same activity then jack smith is calling criminal on the part of other people. he is not indicted in the documents case and yet he appears to be extremely helpful witness to jack smith in the case. i think the most notable thing to me is that he is not reported the one of the unindicted coconspirators federally, meaning that jack smith did not think that he had enough to really sort of lay out his role in the current d. c. case. i think with respect to the unindicted coconspirators, the six, i think basically they will be charged by jack smith. it s just a question of when, not if. but with respect to meadows, i think if i had to guess to see what his good lawyers are doing, is to kind of help jack smith. he might want him as a witness. knowing jack smith, i think he is saying, look it, if you re got wants to cooperate, he s pleading guilty.