again. there will be further political violence. let s not forget what the intent was of january 6th, it was to overturn american democracy. this has to be front and center in our politics. people sense intuitively, like what adam schiff said, there are those voters in the middle swinging these elections back and forth. it s not like they can t tell this is wrong. it s not like they can t tell there is something extreme and undemocrat bik the direction republican politics is taking. but i think it is necessary to remind people. i would like to see the reforms that would make it less likely, that make it so they can t overturn elections, so people can vote without voter suppression, making it impossible for them and down the line. if two democratic senators will continue to block the action necessary to make those legislative changes, then there has to be an argument. every election until we do resolve the issues that our democracy itself is on the ballot. if everything else you care
going to instead castigate rosenstein, and the question is what does this mean for what comes next? you know, is he going to fire rosenstein in order to fine the special counsel? what comes next is the big question that remains here. dianne feinstein certainly has that ominous fear in her mind. rebecca berg, she issued a very strong statement. let me read a couple of lines from it. i m growing increasingly concerned that the president will attempt to fire not only robert mueller, the special counsel investigating possible obstruction of justice, but also deputy attorney general rosenstein who appointed mueller. the message the president is sending through his tweets is that he believes the rule of law doesn t apply to him and that anyone who thinks otherwise will be fired. that s undemocrat dick on its face and a play than the violation of the president s oath of office. those are very, very strong words from her. right, especially when you consider that dianne feinstein is really
president but the only thing a president should and can do on foreign policy is to defer to the pentagon. which is fundamentally undemocrat. let s go back to arab spring. we re in an era, i want to take this back, this was not a military change throughout arab spring. it was an economic change, people being frustrated with their lives and with dictatorships and their inability to get jobs. this is an opportunity for america to capture this moment of change and shift the debate from the military one to the development one. if we can shift human aid, american aid, to all military, the egyptian military and put that same money into developing jobs in these countries, it will help america and help these countries stabilize. richard engel, nbc news chief foreign correspondent and yesterday my executive producer came down and he had just done a head. i said to richard, will you object our show tomorrow? sure, sure, thinking he had signed up for a four-minute sit in studio. you ve been he