Essentially argue that the uk government do not have the power to do what they have done and that they don t have any reasonable justification to do what they have justification to do what they have just done, to say there is no evidence and no good reasons why they have blocked this legislation. the uk government will counter by saying they have evidence about why they think it will affect the situation and they believe it will affect the equality situation which operates across the whole of the case of the uk government will have to say why and give the reasons why they think the proposed change to gender recognition reform will alter the equalities legislation in an adverse way, that is important. that is the crux of adverse way, that is important. that is the crux of it, adverse way, that is important. that is the crux of it, and adverse way, that is important. that is the crux of it, and the crux of the legal battle, when it takes place, but what is your view? who do you thi
By all parties and hasn t been objectivity since. it was intended not as a blocking mechanism, but an enabling mechanism so we could pass legislation without changing functions. there was concern at the time by colleagues of the secretary of state that this could be used as a veto. although the uk government is prepared to use these powers if necessary, they are a matter of last resort. the uk government was therefore aim to resolve any difficulties through discussion to avoid any action of the devolved administration of having an impact on non resolved matters. is this a last resort? has a secular state had extensive discussions with the scottish government before taken this decision secretary of state.
35 ”55 is where it is adversely section 35 is where it is adversely affected~ section 35 is where it is adversely affected. we have 28 days to make a decision affected. we have 28 days to make a decision before the legislation goes for royal decision before the legislation goes for royal assent, and in this case, the legal for royal assent, and in this case, the legal test that has been given to us the legal test that has been given to us and the legal test that has been given to us and proved by our officials is one of to us and proved by our officials is one of section 35, which is adverse effect one of section 35, which is adverse effect on one of section 35, which is adverse effect on two parts of uk gb legislation. that is where we are out, legislation. that is where we are out, we ve legislation. that is where we are out, we ve got 28 days to make that decision, out, we ve got 28 days to make that decision, and we have to make a decision decision, and we hav
Battle between the scottish and uk government when as i understand at the scottish entry in the government are trying to protect women s rights the scottish secretary. despite the howling we are getting from the snp, can the scottish secretary confirm that all the snp have to do is bring forward a bill in the scottish parliament that protects the rights of women and girls across the rights of women and girls across the uk? , ., , the rights of women and girls across theuk? , . ., ., , the uk? yes, actually, fortunately, that addresses the uk? yes, actually, fortunately, that addresses one the uk? yes, actually, fortunately, that addresses one of the uk? yes, actually, fortunately, that addresses one of the - the uk? yes, actually, fortunately, that addresses one of the points i that addresses one of the points that addresses one of the points that the that addresses one of the points that the shadow secretary of state for scotland late at night can address for scotland late