For this in australia where people have been diverted to a third place, a third country for processing. as i understand, this is a resettlement arrangement, not a processing arrangement. even if people qualify for asylum after being sent to rwanda, they will not be brought to the uk, they will be given a new life there. it is a radical proposal and a bold one. behind it, it is an attempt to stop this tragedy we are seeing on the english channel. ihla seeing on the english channel. no one disputes that the loss of life is the thing that is trying to be targeted. can i go through some basics with you, given your expertise? is it illegal to cross the channel on a small boat if you are seeking asylum in the uk? that de-ends are seeking asylum in the uk? that depends which are seeking asylum in the uk? twat depends which lawyer you talk to. i have had conversations with very eminent qc is coming at this from different political perspectives. there is no such thing as an illegal