have anything to do with this, did the white house have anything to do with this. it is just a matter of following that money and finding out what these people say. so that is the whole point of subpoenaing those bank records. i want to ask you about, you know, the committee focusing on those 187 minutes of trump inaction as the capitol was under attack. what do they need to show in order to make a criminal referral there? well, the 180 minutes of inaction by trump by itself doesn t really tell us anything. but in context of all of the evidence, it could be extremely damning. the real issue here is did donald trump act with corrupt intent. that is the whole issue in this criminal obstruction case. right now there is lots of smoke out there, there is lots of circumstantial evidence. we know that there is a conspiracy to basically obstruct congress through perpetrating
house did and when you see what he did personally, you know, all flowing from the idea that he may have violated his oath of office, it s extraordinarily disappointing, and it s heartbreaking and i m no less angry about it today than i was on this particular day. these fox hosts and others had two eyes and a tv could see what was happening. anybody that was watching it could see what what is happening and who was responsible for it and who had the power to stop it, and i think as we look at it all today. yeah. donald trump failed. he failed. the power to stop it. let mow pick up on that because the committee keeps stressing this 187 minutes of trump inaction, right? mark meadows dispute that had claim though last night even after all of this was reveal. he was on news max. listen. what they have done is had a contempt vote. we ve tried very hard in a very transparent and accommodating way to share non-privileged information. right. and what we found out tonight