There was an agreement between one or more persons to achieve the object of the conspiracy and that was set forth in the indictment. The government is really going to set forth a pretty narrow number of charges here and frankly, it would not be unexpected if they had a convention on some and not others conviction. It is frankly expected in these types of cases. The indictment in these types of cases. The indictment is in these types of cases. The indictment is also in these types of cases. The indictment is also mentioned six Co Conspirators, none have been charged in this indictment. For attorneys, a former Department Of Justice official at a political us to leave i consulted who aided trumps efforts. Why do you think they were not charged . Trumps efforts. Why do you think they were not charged . Thats a good cuestion. I they were not charged . Thats a good question i was they were not charged . Thats a good question. I was expecting they were not charged . Thats a good question. I w
Important stand testifying at a try. it is important to stand testifying at a try. it is important to understand what the former important to understand what the former vice president said last week or even former vice president said last week or even ten former vice president said last week or even ten days ago that donald trump s or even ten days ago that donald trump s behaviour with respect to january trump s behaviour with respect to january the 6th was reckless but not criminal january the 6th was reckless but not criminal so january the 6th was reckless but not criminal so if everyone has his feet in mike criminal so if everyone has his feet in mike pence and believe he is a man in mike pence and believe he is a man of in mike pence and believe he is a man of high integrity and a honest person man of high integrity and a honest person and man of high integrity and a honest person and believed he save this country. person and believed he save this country, t
This business or one offset. exactly. and one off sale is clearly not in the business of firing of selling firearms but, you know, there have been cases of as few as one or two gun sales without background checks that have led to criminal prosecution, so the number of guns is not the only factors. it s been reported the president would be closing the so-called gun show loophole. that s not exactly the case. it s not, no. it s making the loophole smaller. it probably more of the people at that gun show would clearly have to file, do background checks before selling guns but it would take a law from congress to make them all do background checks and that clearly is not happen. fair to say he s trying to reinterpret existing laws? yeah, he s trying to do what the federal government does. the laws are written in a general way and the government files regulations that explain what the law means. legally, i don t think he is on in trouble ground. you think he s on firm footin
yeah, he s trying to do what the federal government does. the laws are written in a general way and the government files regulations that explain what the law means. legally, i don t think he is on in trouble ground. you think he s on firm footing. i think the bigger questin perhaps is what difference it will make. it s not the number of crimes prevented by this action strikes me as probably going to be pretty low but look at san bernardino, those guns were purchased legally. those guns would not be covered by this. you know, you still have the problem of straw purchasers, people who buy them or give them or sell them to someone else. guns are still going to be very available. also, states do most of the gun regulation in this country, not the federal government and many states have very lax gun laws and that s why crimes in new york, massachusetts, which have