viewers joining us here in the united states and all around the world. i m rosemary church. just ahead, a u.s. official says israel was responsible for the strike in lebanon that killed a senior hamas leader. donald trump appeals the decision to remove him from maine s presidential primary ballot, accusing the state s top election official of bias. and investigators begin their search into what caused that fiery runway collision in japan. live from atlanta, this is cnn newsroom with rosemary church. thanks for joinings us. a top hamas leader has been assassinated, and a u.s. official told cnn that israel carried out the hit. senior hamas leader saleh al arouri was killed in the suburbs of lebanon on tuesday. lebanese media report the strike targeted an office belonging to hamas, and several others were also killed, including leaders from the hamas military wing. earlier, an israeli government spokesperson issued this statement about the incident. israel has not taken
economy wide response. screws and is good, discussion is good, the more people involved in taking action and engaging in taking action and engaging in climate change is better. the more private sector engagement in this issue, i think, is better than what we saw ten or 20 or 30 years ago when it was very government driven. iii when it was very government driven. ., . ~ ., driven. if we go back, at kop 27, is driven. if we go back, at kop 27. is loss driven. if we go back, at kop 27, is loss and driven. if we go back, at kop 27, is loss and damage - driven. if we go back, at kop 27, is loss and damage fund| 27, is loss and damage fund was a for richer countries to pay poorer countries suffering the impact of climate change, how do you see that working out, that has been one of the numerous sticking points? i think private sector needs to get more engage in loss and damage as well. it is just one section, it would help society, insurance needs to be more engaged, issues reg
a investment. warm welcome to the programme. a warm welcome to the programme. good morning. sounds like a bit of a mess in germany in terms of trying to sort out the money matters so they can go ahead with much needed spending, your take? go ahead with much needed spending, yourtake? it is go ahead with much needed spending, your take?- spending, your take? it is a mess something spending, your take? it is a mess something that - spending, your take? it is a mess something that the i mess something that the introduction said is self imposed, this constitutional break supposed to be stopping undue spending and returning to balanced budget, it was introduced into 2009 at a time when germany thought it could beat off the rest of the world in terms of its own economic competitiveness, it ought then the euro crisis would not be something that would be hugely problematic for it. so it had built into the constitution its commitment, to have a balanced budget every year. and there
fossil fuel leading companies economywide not there. first reaction of heavy fossil fuel leading company economy wide response. scrutiny is good, discussion is good, the more people involved in taking action and engaging in climate change is by far the better. the more private sector engagement in this issue is better than what we saw 10, 20, 30 years ago when it was a very governmental driven process. if we go back, at cop27 a loss and damage fund was agreed upon for richer countries to pay the poorer countries which were suffering the impacts of climate change. how do you see that working out, because that has been one of the numerous sticking points? the private sector needs to get far more engaged in discussion around adaptation to finance too. loss and damage just one element that is going to help build more resilient society. insurance needs to be more engaged, project developments, fiancing and constructing. particularly in asia, as it urbanises and develops economies
is good, discussion is good, the more people involved in taking action and engaging in climate change is by far the better, the more private sector engagement in this issue is better than what we saw ten, 20, 30 years better than what we saw ten, 20,30 years ago when it better than what we saw ten, 20, 30 years ago when it was government driven process. it government driven process. if we go back there at cop27, a loss and damage fund was agreed upon for richer countries to pay poor countries which were suffering the impacts of climate change. how do you see that working out, because that has been run of the numerous sticking points? the has been run of the numerous sticking points? sticking points? the private sector needs sticking points? the private sector needs to sticking points? the private sector needs to get - sticking points? the private sector needs to get far - sticking points? the private| sector needs to get far more engaged. loss and damagejust one element