Taken the position if a bulb out is being built over water pipes its the mta responsibility to pay to move those water pipes so theyre not under the bulb out is a significant expense on the mta and frankly its not necessary to move the water pipes its for the future theoretical convenience of the puc if in 20 years they need to reach the pipe they dont want to dig underneath the sidewalk but underneath the streets that are a significant burden that the project sponsors from doing those bulb outs for a savings for the puc when frankly when youre doing a bulb out they can look at the pipes and see if its old and switch it out and did do it. Many cost shouldnt be passed on. I dont know if this is the future of a future hearing in terms of enforcement i know i held a hearing last year about double Parking Enforcement and excuseme. I should say the total lack of Parking Enforcement not only a sf pd issue they are the aggressive tools it is necessary sometimes a delivery truck has no way to
A spirit of innovation and were going to tickle this and thats the spirit of walk first and like to see the list sort head in the right direction. Ms. Reynolds can you ask questions its the end of my prediction. Thank you for the presentation. Im curious whether those 24 projects are deliciously between two years on the ground by january of 2016 the clock is ticking in february, you know, we did at the sixth and howard the fulton is going into the ground were not waiting because the clock is ticking and the other thing i want to note there are more than 24 projects mr. There are 33 or 34 of them. The idea theres cushion there if Small Business something is not feasible or is happening to delay the project we want a deep list are you talking about the temporary bib outs and the im going the track links through the intersection for one. A couple of questions on some of the streets your proposing that dont have funding do you have a sense of what the funds will look like to make that happ
Theoretical convenience of the puc if in 20 years they need to reach the pipe they dont want to dig underneath the sidewalk but underneath the streets that are a significant burden that the project sponsors from doing those bulb outs for a savings for the puc when frankly when youre doing a bulb out they can look at the pipes and see if its old and switch it out and did do it. Many cost shouldnt be passed on. I dont know if this is the future of a future hearing in terms of enforcement i know i held a hearing last year about double Parking Enforcement and excuseme. I should say the total lack of Parking Enforcement not only a sf pd issue they are the aggressive tools it is necessary sometimes a delivery truck has no way to pull over but we all see that everyday. The delivery trucks that clearly they have a place to pull over and dont both its laziness its easier to park in the middle of the street and cabs that pickup and drop off they can pull over but stop in the middle of the street
And when did we actually start work all of those pieces and the decisions that happen along the way those are tremendously complicated projects. I understand there are designs difference between polk street and what you talked about on sixth and howard it will be helpful in not only describing the process but give us suggestions on how to make that process what i mean, i dont know what the process is like how we can push all the departments to work quicker is it you need more staff or the processes can work at the same time what can we do to improve the process so when funding are not the issue those projects are able to get on the ground i think one example youve all familiar every project has an environmental phase and a lot of times the detail design will not start until its been legislated so the design and the survey work and were doing that on some projects and trying it out before the environmental is done youre taking a risk, you know, not something that governmental agencies d
Pleased to see that. With respect to the puc ill give you my view the puc has taken the position if a bulb out is being built over water pipes its the mta responsibility to pay to move those water pipes so theyre not under the bulb out is a significant expense on the mta and frankly its not necessary to move the water pipes its for the future theoretical convenience of the puc if in 20 years they need to reach the pipe they dont want to dig underneath the sidewalk but underneath the streets that are a significant burden that the project sponsors from doing those bulb outs for a savings for the puc when frankly when youre doing a bulb out they can look at the pipes and see if its old and switch it out and did do it. Many cost shouldnt be passed on. I dont know if this is the future of a future hearing in terms of enforcement i know i held a hearing last year about double Parking Enforcement and excuseme. I should say the total lack of Parking Enforcement not only a sf pd issue they are