someone is going to pay for this. there are easier ways to die. i got a call from a cousin, saying. he s in the hospital. how did he look? horrible. he drank something sweet, and deadly. there was no question. the real question, why would he do it? stressed, out something was going on there. what happened to ray? soon, it wasn t just doctors and the families asking the question. it was detectives. most likely not a suicide. he had enemies. he received a surprise package. this man sent my data bob. a surprise phone call from a it s josh mankiewicz from day line, is there anything you want to say? welcome to dateline. on a warm day in august, 65 year old ray quenched his thirst with a cool drink that drink contained a secret. a potion. so sinister, he would be dead within hours. not only did investigators have to figure out what killed the happily retired pennsylvania man but who would want him dead and why, here is josh mankiewicz with somet
it doesn t make any sense. it took my father, you killed my father. someone is going to pay for this. there are easier ways to die. i got a call from a cousin, saying. he s in the hospital. how did he look? horrible. he drank something sweet, and deadly. there was no question. the real question, why would he do it? stressed, out something was going on there. what happened to ray? soon, it wasn t just doctors and the families asking the question. it was detectives. most likely not a suicide. he had enemies. he received a surprise package. this man sent my data bob. a surprise phone call from a it s josh mankiewicz from day line, is there anything you want to say? no shortage of suspects, just a shortage of detectives. all kinds of things go wrong and murder investigations. but the police department running out of money, is not one of the things you think of. now. i preston. i did what i had to do. would she ever find justice? it s your
suicide? that is it. that is a correct. he produced his own expert when is to refute the toxicity timeline as suspects science. it s impossible to determine when the ethylene glycol may have been ingested, because it may have been ingested as one dose or at one time, or several smaller doses over an undetermined period of time. in his clothes, the attorney suggested that the amount at the very least, has reasonable doubt. i m suggesting to you that it is a suicide. and if the facts do not add up. i think you have to rule in favor of the defendant. teresa never testified. her family, and raise, waited. as the judge retire to his chambers. to make his decision. coming up! i was so afraid that she was going to get away with it. i have faith in her. the verdict.
correct in. that s correct. teresa s attorney went after the prosecution s timeline. he got one of the state s medical witnesses to concede she couldn t tell exactly when ray drank the antifreeze. but you don t know how long that he suffered from it nor do you know how much he had ingested? correct. under cross-examination, the m.e. admitted he couldn t answer the question at the heart of the case. that means you don t know whether it was a homicide or you don t know whether it was a suicide, is that a fair and correct? that is correct, yes. hentemann produced his own ebbs pert witness to refute the state s toxicity timeline as suspect science. it is impossible to determine when the ethylene glycol may have been ingested because it may have been ingested as one dose or at one time or several smaller doses over an undetermined period of time. in his close, attorney hentemann suggested all of it amounted to, at the very least, reasonable doubt. i m suggesting to y