There was substantial evidence of criminal intent by the president , in his view. Were going to see bob mueller walk out and were going to be watching for is he alone, is mr. Barr behind him or in the room, what are the first words that bob mueller wants to publicly utter . A man who is reticent, sometimes to a fault his supporters say. He clearly has something to say. Does he in any way elude to or cite what we know to be major disagreements with mr. Barr about what mueller found in his investigation and about evidence about sitting the president. Here we have for the first time publicly in more than two years Robert Mueller. Thank you for being here. Two years ago the Acting Attorney General asked me to sv as Special Counsel. And he created the special
counsels office. The appointed directed the office to investigate russian interference in the 2016 president ial election. This included investigating any links or coordination between the russian government and individuals associated
Disregard house rules. For what purposes . Just completelyusrules on not i wanted to confirm point addressing the Minority Hearing today. If i hear t that one more time, of order is the rules of ill address that when were decorum. I dont believe the gentleman marking up impeachment articles. What is the use of a minority from florida meant to violate him andnt i want to give him to hearing day if youre going have benefit of o doubt. To hear evidence of the markup than once he referred if you get the confirmation of to a new york lawyer. If hek is prepared to explain what he meant, i will withdraw the master bedroomrkup yourself. My Point Of Order. Even the most heated development does not know show any way that that is not a recognizable Point Of Order. Mr. Chairman, Point Of Order can be theyre. If you destroy the institutional regarding the schedule. There is no Point Of Order integrity, which again, the staff have talked about today, regarding the schedule. Well, onf this case there
abuse his office, undermine his attempted to do that during this oath of office, use the powers process. of the presidency for his own i d like to say that. personal gain are clearly going to be articles of impeachment and there are any number of ways and i have a couple of other you can slice how they re things, mr. armstrong. stated, including abusing your go ahead. you know, ambassador sondland power in order for bribery, for extorsion and to interfere in our election. is relied on and he went from a i think obstruction is crit witness that was not very critically important and i agree favorable to very favorable at that it is important to pull his hearing. andhi one of the remarkable forward the t roadmap that robe mueller shared on obstruction of statements at his hearing was justice and, you know, barry that everyone was in the loop. he types up this email to burke kind k of left the door on to that by making some of those points in hisso opening about t pompeo, to the secret
of pelosi s message has held them back from being quite as aggressive as they have the ability to be in court. one of the reasons it s so important is we have to remember for the democrats the coalition that got barack obama elected is made up of the same people who would be convicted of crime on less evidence that is available right now on donald trump on obstruction of justice. that is actually a signal that while the job of the president is to faithfully execute the laws of the nation, part of what robert mueller said today is there will serious questions about whether that s happening both from the national intelligence perspective as well as obstruction. going to court and saying let congress do its constitutional job is something congress can do right now and can do it quickly. matt miller, if jerry nadler
bob mueller, precise and careful in his language, making a statement on his terms, and that s why i don t think he wants to be part of any type of political and partisan show on the hill. and as has been mentioned, he would read his report and go no further than that. two he made it quite clear that were it not for existing doj policy as well as a constitutional process to hold a sitting president to account, that there is not a basis for him and his team to go forward with an indictment of the sitting president but also he said clearly if he was able to exonerate a president of wrong doing, he would have done that. so i do think he made a very explicit that there is an outstanding issue when it comes to wrong doing on the part of donald trump on obstruction of justice and there are the options of dealing with it while