request for a 1:00 conditional permit lifted to 1:45 and our security ratio from 1:40 to 1:75 which is really impacting our financials and making it hard to survive and we made a lot of changes and followed all of the rules and i am in front of you asking for this on the conditions. okay. all right. why don t you step back and officer moore? thank you for being so patient with us. no problem. no problem. so commissioners, i m officer tobias moore and i am here representing richmond station and captain ferenyo and i just want to say that the relationship with the neck of the wood the formally the rocket room has been tremendously better than the last time that i stood in front of you. we have a very good dialogue now and the communication by cell phone, meetings in person, and as well as e-mails, almost daily, it seems like. and the majority of all of the issues have basically gone away. and as far as the condition on the entertainment we are in favor of a allowing the
a noise complaint resolution between both the razz room and the neighbors, if a conditional use permit is issued tonight, northern station is recommending the conditions that have been discussed with the razz room prior to this evening. are these your conditions? this is the police conditions? i have a question, the ratio of security to patrons be one security guard to every 75, what is the rationale on that? initially we requested one to 50 and after discussing the ratio with stefeno, we changed it to 1 to 75. so the law says 1 to 100. and the nature of these performances would say one to 100, why would you want to have more security is my question? do you have a by basis for that? we felt that it was safer for the patrons that were attending if you feel differently we can go to 100. i thought that maybe something had happened that we were not aware of. nothing has happened. anyone have questions for the police? thank you, very much. nice to meet you. all
do you have a by basis for that? we felt that it was safer for the patrons that were attending if you feel differently we can go to 100. i thought that maybe something had happened that we were not aware of. nothing has happened. anyone have questions for the police? thank you, very much. nice to meet you. all right. so i want to make a couple of comments and i am going to open it to the other commissioners. i want to disclose that i have been a patron of the razz room and i have seen the shows by veronica and donna and others, and i was also a patron of the plush room. and so i have disclosed that. someone said something about having a lot of windows and acting in good faith. and that you, they lost that ability to believe that your good faith because you said that you were going to sound proof and you didn t. and somebody else said that you should not have to carry the burden of past operators and i agree with that. that you should not have to carry the burden
conditions? i have a question, the ratio of security to patrons be one security guard to every 75, what is the rationale on that? initially we requested one to 50 and after discussing the ratio with stefeno, we changed it to 1 to 75. so the law says 1 to 100. and the nature of these performances would say one to 100, why would you want to have more security is my question? do you have a by basis for that? we felt that it was safer for the patrons that were attending if you feel differently we can go to 100. i thought that maybe something had happened that we were not aware of. nothing has happened. anyone have questions for the police? thank you, very much. nice to meet you. all right. so i want to make a couple of comments and i am going to open it to the other commissioners. i want to disclose that i have been a patron of the razz room and i have seen the shows by veronica and donna and others, and i was also a patron of the plush room. and so i have discl
someone said something about having a lot of windows and acting in good faith. and that you, they lost that ability to believe that your good faith because you said that you were going to sound proof and you didn t. and somebody else said that you should not have to carry the burden of past operators and i agree with that. that you should not have to carry the burden of past operators but i do think that if you make a statement in good faith, and people take you for your word, you should fulfill that. the acoustic music that you are discussing, i have no. even if someone plays the piano that is not amplified, and in your place, how are they going to sing? without amplification? because if you amplify a voice, it is no longer acoustic, it is now amplified. now, so, this is not about opinions any more. so the voice would be amplified. so, therefore, it is not acoustic music. a guy standing on the corner playing a, guitar is acoustic, once you put on amplification you need to ha