the former president doesn t have the authority, to order them to not comply. we are prepared to take any and all actions, available to us, to force compliance. the former president has done everything he can, to try to get in the way of this investigation. i would expect that we would make decisions on relatively quickly on what the next steps might be. today that committee issued three more subpoenas, due to pro trump activists, plus an organization deeply involved in rallies, held before the insurrection. one request for documents and deposition, went to allie alexander. the leader of the group stop the steal, which as its name might imply, was one of the most prominent organizations pushing the big lie. the panel cited reports that say that alexander possibly used violence to achieve his organizations goals. and had been in touch with the white house, and members of congress. there is also stunning new
were instituted. what it said is you cannot handcuff children unless they represent an imminent threat to you and even if they represent an imminent threat, what happens is if there are no other reasonable measures available only then can you do it. you factor that into the fact that you talked about the child being 8 years old, 3 1/2 feet, 52 pounds, and it goes into whether it s reasonable, appropriate, and necessary. because this kid did take a swing. the aclu the aclu points it out in the lawsuit, but this officer s attorney to your point, the officer s attorney told a paper there that they were placing themselves and other people in danger of harm and that s what the book says to do. he says he has a defense. does he have a defense here? in the event the officer feels they re in imminent harm the policy clearly says you can do it, but it also says you cannot do it, kate, to force compliance. and so what i think the other side aclu is going to argue that he was saying if yo