the supreme court finally put its immunity ruling out saying all presidents not just donald trump are entitled to some form of it. what does it mean for special counsel s jack smith s prosecution and does it punt everything until after the election? we ll talk to a former attorney general bill barr in just a moment. first fox team coverage with shannon premier on the fall-out. and what former president donald trump is staying about that decision. welcome, everybody, neil cavuto. very happy to have you on a very busy new days. now the latest. reporter: neil, it is a big decision, a big win today for the trump camp, but it does not mean this case is over, far from it. because now it heads back down to the lower courts and chief justice roberts writing for the majority explains why he said this. the concerns we noted at the outset, the expedition of this case, the lack of factual analysis by the lower courts and the absence of pertinent briefing by the parties thus become more
along with judge jeanine pirro, kevin walling, johnny jones, and greg gutfeld. it s 5:00 in new york city, and this is the five. apparently, joe biden is not going anywhere, even as we learn shocking new details about his mental decline. the president, huddling with his family over the weekend to do a photo shoot with annie leibowitz and hash out what to do about the avalanche calls to step aside. reportedly urged him to stay in the race, and wants staffers fired for overloading biden s brain before the debate. jill m hunter biden are set to be the strongest voices in support of staying the course. the first on wants america to see that his father is scrappy and in command of the facts rather than stumbling aging president americans saw thursday night. so far, top democrats are willing to go to bat for him. it was a bad performance. i know when i see what i call preparation overload. i m with joe biden. it is our assignment to make sure that he gets over the finish li
the question to both of you, and you first, abigail, this timeline. when do you expect this inquiry, this investigation to be concluded, presented to judiciary and voted upon do we go forward? it s a really good question. right now what democrats are looking at is expediency. the timeline i ve heard is obviously they ll work through the res send and keep doing this. the end of the intel investigation will likely hinge upon cooperation from the white house. adam schiff said they don t expect them to cooperate. mike quigley said the same thing. the timeline will likely be truncated. a lot of people are throwing out the timeline of thanksgiving as when they want to see this wrapped up. these investigations wrapped up, articles of impeachment drafted and voted upon before thanksgiving. wow, merry christmas. john, your thoughts? what do you think timelinewise?
shif talking about the end of the year as well. how do you see this unfolding timelinewise with the leeway to go to 2020 and the election? i think that speaker pelosi is right we want to make sure we do all due diligence. it should not take a long period of time. basically because you ve got a lot of admissions by the president himself. and you know the parties that are involved. you know that rudy giuliani is involved. and the attorney general barr is involved. and from the whistle-blower, we know there are other individuals that have seen and talked to the whistle-blower about what took place. so i think that you don t need a long, drawn-out period of time that you re going to, do our due diligence. can it be thorough? yes. going to be a thorough, i think that you have a line of witnesses that you could always, already begin to focus on. many of them are within the administration themselves. so i think that we can do it in a timely fashion and clear fashion. so that the america
diplomatic relations to get this solved and more equally distributed? we have for years talked with them about currency manipulation which costs us jobs in america. we have focused on the fact that they steal our patents, don t respect our patent laws. now we have them hoarding materials, raw materials. we talk and talk and they continue to do it. what i appreciate about the administration is they have against china. and that pushback has done more to be able to change behavior unfortunately than just talking to them. senator what is the timeline, though? i know as i said that you sent this letter on with your other counterparts, your colleagues, to salazar and also to tim geithner. so where do you stand timelinewise? when do you want to see something done about this? we want them to act as soon as possible. we would like them to act