Whatwe that means, its to use e power of the office to obtain an improper personal benefit while ignoring orfi injuring the national interest, or acts in ways that are grossly inconsistent with and undermine the separation of powers that is the foundation of our democratic system. Now, this question of whether the president engaged in abuse of power came up before when this congress considered the impeachment of president nixon. And president nixon famously said, if the president does it, it is notde illegal. And this body rejected that because thats not so. That goes directly contrary to what the founders said. But President Trump has said the same thing in responding to the prior investigation by the Department Of Justice and defending his conduct. Heres what he said. I have an article 2 where i have the right to do whatever i want as president. That he has the right to do whatever he wants as president. That is as wrong as when president nixon said a similar thing. That is not what
million, the special counsel s 19 attorneys and 40 fbi agents, analysts and staff, found no conspiracy or coordination between the trump campaign and the russian government. after the trump-russia collusion allegations did not pan out, democrats then focused their efforts on obstruction of justice. they visiton sized attorney general barr for concluding that none crime of obstruction had occurred in the special counsel investigation. but, in fact, it was entirely appropriate for the attorney general to make that call because the special counsel declined to do so. not surprisingly, the democrats mueller hearing was underwhelming, to say the least, and thehe sequel with corey lewandowski definitely did not prove theni impeachment needle either. the intelligence committee is heavily invested in the russia collusion investigation.