i didn t watch the speech. but that s a number of member said that to me. he used that term. he said like, we need to inspire something. wasn t he said something a couple days out it was something like that, yes. it was incendiary. i mean, you got the maxine waters, all that stuff to. i know she s been there in a very strong position right there. our members have got to start paying attention that type of stuff. brooks apparently said today, the american patriot started taking down names and kicking ass, which i was even a step further than the rhetorical he thinks the president is going to be impeached for his comment
paying attention that type of stuff. brooks apparently said today, the american patriot started taking down names and kicking ass, which i was even a step further than the rhetorical he thinks the president is going to be impeached for his comment someone give me the intro. i m either have either of them apologized for what they ve done? i have not seen that anywhere. he introduced the censure and tweet out that, i m against violence, martin luther king, i walked back but, sure,
remarkable attack there on the president, dana bash, thank you very much indeed. i ll bring you a team who disagrees on syria, rick santorum is a form presidential candidate, also the author of the american patriot. and the former new mexico governor, welcome to you both. an extraordinary review on this piece by vladimir putin, i want to read you if i can, first of all. bill richardson, what he says about american exceptionalism. he says i would rather disagree with the case he made on american exceptionalism, stating that is what makes us different, exceptional. putin says it is extremely dangerous for people to see themselves as exceptional, whatever the motivation, there are countries big and small, both with democratic ideas, and we re all different. when we ask for the lord s blessings, we must not forget that god created us equal.
individuals. they re attacking the corporations, the business entities and such. so i don t think that people have anything to be concerned about in terms of the consumers, you know. but the hackers themselves are people who do that, this is something that we have to be aware of because people who have skills, computer skills, can go into the cloud and pretty much pick out whatever information they need to. let s talk about this from the perspective of us as the, you know, the american patriot. what can be done to our government agencies and to the cia and other areas where we ve seen what wikileaks has been able to do and the information they ve been able to get and get out there from inside sources. what can hackers from the outside do to get into those type of you mean the department of defense computers and such? yeah. it s more sophisticated to direct an attack against the department of defense as their sites have better encryption and much more sophisticated firewalls.
now, it could be years before the repeal could take place. thank you, kelly o donnell. so a lot of moving parts today on capitol hill as well as at the white house. to explain what all of this means, i m joined by mark whittaker. mark, great to have you with us. the left wing of the democratic party is angry with the president on the tax cuts. it s not clear whether don t ask, don t tell or the d.r.e.a.m. act will survive in congress. so where has the president down wrong not to get these through by the end of the year? well, i think they re all in play. look, i think on the fundamental tax deal, i think he is going to get his deal through. the reason is that nobody in congress, including the angry democrats, wants to be held responsible for tax rates going up at the end of the year for americans across the board in this very tough economic. i think it s very interesting as kelly was saying that there s all this talk now on this somewhat minor provision of the