Between an attorney and their clie client, in this case the president, is very sacrosanct. so to breach that is not the precedent we should be set persian gulf. the judge, not the first judge to do so, thsays that bas doesn t hold water. these are duly commissioned their subpoenas matter but not for this particular witch hunt. the substance absolutely matters. i disagree with her. i think she ll be overturned. that s the beauty of the system. you don t have to like it but you must obey. no judge is going to call it a witch hunt. we can guarantee that right now. what will it mean in terms of subject matter what they get up there to testify? first of all, it is going to be really hard to draw a distinction between don mcgahn and the need for congress and entitlement of congress to have that testimony and the need for congress if they choose to take