Rosenstengel
EAST ST. LOUIS A woman is suing the manufacturers of Paragard, alleging she had to undergo a hysterectomy to fully remove the intrauterine device.
Georgia Motter filed a complaint May 14 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois East St. Louis Division against Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., Teva Women s Health LLC, individually and as successor in interest to Teva Women s Health Inc., Duramed Pharmaceuticals Inc., a division of Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc., doing business as Teva Women s Health Inc., The Coopersurgical Inc., and others, alleging negligence, strict liability design defect and manufacturing defect, failure to warn, fraud and other claims.
John J. Driscoll | settlementhelpers.com
BELLEVILLE A woman claims the ParaGuard Intrauterine Device (IUD) caused her to suffer loss of reproductive health and other injuries due to a defective design.
Jennifer Horton filed a complaint (part 2) April 9 in the St. Clair County Circuit Court against Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., Teva Women s Health Inc., doing business as Teva Women s Health LLC, The Cooper Companies Inc., and Coppersurgical Inc., alleging negligence, strict liability and fraud.
According to the complaint, Horton was implanted with a ParaGuard IUD in 2009. She alleges that when she went to have the IUD removed on April 12, 2019, the device was malpositioned. She claims that despite her healthcare provider following the instructions provided by Teva on removing the device, only a portion of the ParaGuard was able to be removed with one arm missing. Horton claims the arm of the IUD device had to be removed through a hysteroscope.
C R Bard Inc.: Remark: Transferring Case To The Eastern District Of Pennsylvania Via Electronic Transfer. This Is A Text Entry Only. There Is No Pdf Document Associated With This Entry. (map) [transferred From Arizona On 2/25/2021.]
Weekly Newsletter
Sign up ×
By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from Pennsylvania Record. You can unsubscribe at any time. Protected by Google ReCAPTCHA. Case Transferred In From District Of Arizona; Case Number 2:17-cv-03568. Original File Certified Copy Of Transfer Order And Docket Sheet Received.
Case number 2:21-cv-00874-MAK was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
IUCD (Intra-Uterine Contraceptive Devices) Market 2021- By Segments, SWOT Analysis, Companies, & Competition, Trends, Global Demand, Top Leaders and foreca