Of the cases that Defense Counsel had cited within their brief that had absolutely no application to the issue that were here before, your honor, today. The first mciver be state has nothing to do. Has nothing related to the disqualification of anyone. I think some of these are just relating to kind of aspiring for broad language about standards to prosecutors. So point taken there but if theyre more all right. Keep it on so as it relates to one of the cases that was referenced here earlier. And as i was also referenced in some of the briefing by Defense Counsel, is the were just savy state, which is to 87 georgia, 542. And ill all of the cases that fall under this, what i would call category is about a attorney who formerly prosecuted a defendant in i guess the same type of case are the same case or similar charges. And that would be why of course, were using the courts found that disqualification would be necessary because of the Relations Kinship that existed between a former client
Of them, jane, just mentioned, testified. defense tried to undermine jane s testimony from 20 years ago. did the house manager s testimony change much other than placing her there? it didn t. really what it did was i think give the jury a feel for how dysfunctional or how strange this whole situation was. i mean, imagine you re a houseman and one of your jobs is to call women and have them come a different one every few hours to give epstein massages and go out to the pool and bunch of women without clothes on. i think they re drawing a picture of the culture that existed at palm beach mansion. prosecutors brought in an expert on traumatic stress to testify on grooming.
Far, particularly the testimony, the atmosphere at epstein s home. well, i think it was a good move calling alessi, this houseman today, because it follows after they had one of the victims testify yesterday, jane, and alessi to some degree corroborated what the victim said yesterday in that she was at epstein s house with maxwell when she was only 14 years old. and alessi recalls seeing her, so i think part of that was to corroborate what she had testified to the day before. and the house manager specifically recalled not just her. he specifically recalled two girls coming to the house he believed they were underage, one am them jane us a just mentioned, who testify. defense tried to undermine jane s testimony from 20 years ago. did the house manager s testimony change much other than
Play then. let me read out loud a little bit of what gordon sondland has changed his testimony to be. this is p-102. he says, i now recall speaking to individually with mr. yermak, where i said that resumption of usaid would likely not occur until ukraine that s a very different tune. but we ve seen testimony change in that direction consistently. i mean there are very clear pictures emerging. jim jordan says the facts are on donald trump s side. that s pure spin. the facts and the testimony is clear and the president s got a real problem. sondland s testimony today could be really key. but already there, that
That. is that timeline the same timeline that you re working under? you know, it there has to be some flexibility as we understand. obviously, you ve seen testimony change and additional people come and testify. one witness leads us to additional information, which really helps you want to learn more from another witness. so it all builds upon itself. but i think that s a proper flow of time. everything is still on the table. those decisions will be made once we finish this week s testimony. can you please tell me who that was doing the interview beside you? i m dying to know. yeah. we ll leave the names anonymous to protect the guilty. congressman quigley. congressman, thank you very much for joining us. we appreciate it. sure. anytime. and we will be right back. great riches will find you when liberty mutual customizes your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. wow. thanks, zoltar. how can i ever repay you?