were not his. here s the hair from the defendant. here s the hair from the crime scene. i m looking at them under the microscope and they have enough characteristics where i can say with reasonable scientific certainty that these two hairs match. they believed in what they were doing, but they were not scientists. it wasn t science at all. at all. joseph was at least the 74th american exonerated of a crime in a case involving the forensic science of microscopic hair analysis. it s not science to visually examine something and say they re the same. that s not science. that s subjectivity. the u.s. department of justice is now reviewing thousands of old convictions containing hair analysis testimony. last april, it released a devastating assessment. in the cases reviewed, fbi testimony about hair evidence was scientifically invalid 95 percent of the time. this is a virus that escaped from the fbi crime lab and it infected the entire criminal justice system and it s
dna testing had proved the hairs were not his. here s the hair from the defendant. here s the hair from the crime scene. i m looking at them under the microscope and they have enough characteristics where i can say with reasonable scientific certainty that these two hairs match. they believed in what they were doing, but they were not scientists. it wasn t science at all. at all. joseph was at least the 74th american exonerated of a crime in a case involving the forensic science of microscopic hair analysis. it s not science to visually examine something and say they re the same. that s not science. that s subjectivity. the u.s. department of justice is now reviewing thousands of old convictions containing hair analysis testimony. last april, it released a devastating assessment. in the cases reviewed, fbi testimony about hair evidence was scientifically invalid 95 percent of the time. this is a virus that escaped from the fbi crime lab and it infected the entire
certainty that these two hairs match. they believed in what they were doing, but they were not scientists. it wasn t science at all. at all. joseph was at least the 74th american exonerated of a crime in a case involving the forensic science of microscopic hair analysis. it s not science to visually examine something and say they re the same. that s not science. that s subjectivity. the u.s. department of justice is now reviewing thousands of old convictions containing hair analysis testimony. last april, it released a devastating assessment. in the cases reviewed, fbi testimony about hair evidence was scientifically invalid 95 percent of the time. this is a virus that escaped from the fbi crime lab and it infected the entire criminal justice system and it s going to take a lot of work to undo it. the integrity of the criminal justice system is at stake. plain and simple. this is the story of how, for years, the fbi used an untested forensic method in courtrooms a
were not his. here s the hair from the defendant. here s the hair from the crime scene. i m looking at them under the microscope and they have enough characteristics where i can say with reasonable scientific certainty that these two hairs match. they believed in what they were doing, but they were not scientists. it wasn t science at all. at all. joseph was at least the 74th american exonerated of a crime in a case involving the forensic science of microscopic hair analysis. it s not science to visually examine something and say they re the same. that s not science. that s subjectivity. the u.s. department of justice is now reviewing thousands of old convictions containing hair analysis testimony. last april, it released a devastating assessment. in the cases reviewed, fbi testimony about hair evidence was scientifically invalid 95 percent of the time. this is a virus that escaped from the fbi crime lab and it infected the entire criminal justice system and it s
serving almost forty years behind bars. dna testing had proved the hairs were not his. here s the hair from the defendant. here s the hair from the crime scene. i m looking at them under the microscope and they have enough characteristics where i can say with reasonable scientific certainty that these two hairs match. they believed in what they were doing, but they were not scientists. it wasn t science at all. at all. joseph was at least the 74th american exonerated of a crime in a case involving the forensic science of microscopic hair analysis. it s not science to visually examine something and say they re the same. that s not science. that s subjectivity. the u.s. department of justice is now reviewing thousands of old convictions containing hair analysis testimony. last april, it released a devastating assessment. in the cases reviewed, fbi testimony about hair evidence was scientifically invalid 95 percent of the time. this is a virus that escaped from the f