were not his. here s the hair from the defendant. here s the hair from the crime scene. i m looking at them under the microscope and they have enough characteristics where i can say with reasonable scientific certainty that these two hairs match. they believed in what they were doing, but they were not scientists. it wasn t science at all. at all. joseph was at least the 74th american exonerated of a crime in a case involving the forensic science of microscopic hair analysis. it s not science to visually examine something and say they re the same. that s not science. that s subjectivity. the u.s. department of justice is now reviewing thousands of old convictions containing hair analysis testimony. last april, it released a devastating assessment. in the cases reviewed, fbi testimony about hair evidence was scientifically invalid 95 percent of the time. this is a virus that escaped from the fbi crime lab and it infected the entire criminal justice system and it s
dna testing had proved the hairs were not his. here s the hair from the defendant. here s the hair from the crime scene. i m looking at them under the microscope and they have enough characteristics where i can say with reasonable scientific certainty that these two hairs match. they believed in what they were doing, but they were not scientists. it wasn t science at all. at all. joseph was at least the 74th american exonerated of a crime in a case involving the forensic science of microscopic hair analysis. it s not science to visually examine something and say they re the same. that s not science. that s subjectivity. the u.s. department of justice is now reviewing thousands of old convictions containing hair analysis testimony. last april, it released a devastating assessment. in the cases reviewed, fbi testimony about hair evidence was scientifically invalid 95 percent of the time. this is a virus that escaped from the fbi crime lab and it infected the entire
dna testing had proved the hairs were not his. here s the hair from the defendant. here s the hair from the crime scene. i m looking at them under the microscope and they have enough characteristics where i can say with reasonable scientific certainty that these two hairs match. they believed in what they were doing, but they were not scientists. it wasn t science at all. at all. joseph was at least the 74th american exonerated of a crime in a case involving the forensic science of microscopic hair analysis. it s not science to visually examine something and say they re the same. that s not science. that s subjectivity. the u.s. department of justice is now reviewing thousands of old convictions containing hair analysis testimony. last april, it released a devastating assessment. in the cases reviewed, fbi testimony about hair evidence was scientifically invalid 95 percent of the time. this is a virus that escaped from the fbi crime lab and it infected the entire
here s the hair from the defendant. here s the hair from the crime scene. i m looking at them under the microscope and they have enough characteristics where i can say with reasonable scientific certainty that these two hairs match. they believed in what they were doing, but they were not scientists. it wasn t science at all. at all. joseph was at least the 74th american exonerated of a crime in a case involving the forensic science of microscopic hair analysis. it s not science to visually examine something and say they re the same. that s not science. that s subjectivity. the u.s. department of justice is now reviewing thousands of old convictions containing hair analysis testimony. last april, it released a devastating assessment. in the cases reviewed, fbi testimony about hair evidence was scientifically invalid 95 percent of the time. this is a virus that escaped from the fbi crime lab and it infected the entire criminal justice system and it s going to take
here s the hair from the crime scene. i m looking at them under the microscope and they have enough characteristics where i can say with reasonable scientific certainty that these two hairs match. they believed in what they were doing, but they were not scientists. it wasn t science at all. at all. joseph was at least the 74th american exonerated of a crime in a case involving the forensic science of microscopic hair analysis. it s not science to visually examine something and say they re the same. that s not science. that s subjectivity. the u.s. department of justice is now reviewing thousands of old convictions containing hair analysis testimony. last april, it released a devastating assessment. in the cases reviewed, fbi testimony about hair evidence was scientifically invalid 95 percent of the time. this is a virus that escaped from the fbi crime lab and it infected the entire criminal justice system and it s going to take a lot of work to undo it. the integrit