Those are the nonstorefront issues the main thing to notice the storefronts are aged and introduced a new element to the Terrace Plaza and as peoples 3 last year mentioned the paint at the facade it was not originally painted so thats under consideration this is a plan of the proposed replacement of the mustard building replacing with new it storefront that are similar size but Straight Side walls and not be slanted this misinforms in the plans the existing disreplacement the same size and this is an elevation of the proposed facade . The sophisticating and they show the doors in a closed position the idea there will be sliding doors that open up to allow the outdoors into the inside and ace mentioned before well be working with staff on the development of the details for the storefronts the storefronts is part of the package weve submitted for the guidelines well be working with them through that and this elevation shows the proposed storefronts and those are the images of a couple of
Disreplacement the same size and this is an elevation of the proposed facade . The sophisticating and they show the doors in a closed position the idea there will be sliding doors that open up to allow the outdoors into the inside and ace mentioned before well be working with staff on the development of the details for the storefronts the storefronts is part of the package weve submitted for the guidelines well be working with them through that and this elevation shows the proposed storefronts and those are the images of a couple of slides that shows well work with planning to do this o those are shots of the existing condition of the plaza are the area with the red brick from the 1980s it was introduced in 80s was not oriental youll u youll notice at the lower left planter understandably features were introduced in the 80s and the two photos on the right hand are showing the existing conditions that is allowing water to go into the space below this is the original landscape plan it in
Behind the preservation alternative and we need the intent to have a discussion about that in my mind thats the primary purpose of the resolution facadeism i wasnt going to do that laughter this notion of the facade retention i wasnt familiar with 188 g bushy looked at on the golden maps i think the facade the vertical conditions and i dont know where this line is drawn from what i see from 1881 i think that project meets the standards with the horizon editions and the rear edition so if it meets the standards than the mitigation was less than significant so we wouldnt be concerned about the project i personally have yet to see a vertical edition to a building that has retained the facade that i find worthy of going through that mess those projects give preservation a bad name were being forced to keep it crap facade its not the facade that is important its the space behind the facade in my opinion the way in which we integrate those the entry of the ground floor space into the new des
Building can be removed definitely not the normal project. So we dont use that one for example laughter . Commissioner johns. Two things number one mr. Frooir fry you mentioned removing the last photograph of number 6 but you might also look at the second sentence of following photograph that is where it is deemed it improves the project. Correct. The other thing of excluding the landscapes germany think im flavor of that bus its a slippery slope particularly when the landscapes are also subject and will in fact are designed to be changed and the best example of that is Golden Gate Park i certainly would never be in favor of anything which would burden the gardeners in Golden Gate Park where the rec and park we have to justify changing the colors of the b. A. Gondz or substituting one kind of flower for another theres no firm time when that ends but in the case of parks changing the landscaping is one of the things that is implicit in changing the parks we must be careful where does th
Strongly something needs to be heard we can end up you know providing a better project at the end of the day to get that fenway earlier rather than at the end during the Comment Period so a quick one on the specifics 350 bush was that considered demo a major portion as we say the room was a significant portion of the building is being saved. Reconstructed. It has a sort of a strange history because the entitlements have been actually since the 1 todds and how much of that building can be removed definitely not the normal project. So we dont use that one for example laughter . Commissioner johns. Two things number one mr. Frooir fry you mentioned removing the last photograph of number 6 but you might also look at the second sentence of following photograph that is where it is deemed it improves the project. Correct. The other thing of excluding the landscapes germany think im flavor of that bus its a slippery slope particularly when the landscapes are also subject and will in fact are d