had two audits under way and we had really interesting and, i would say, sort of positive developments on both of them today. the first of them is one of these nonsense, you know, cyber ninjas partisan things they re using taxpayer money for, but the republicans in the wisconsin state legislature literally put this thing in the hands of a guy who led the stop-the-steal stolen election rallies in michigan after the election, a guy who subsequently trump tried to give a federal appointment to. i am sure he will be a non-partisan arbiter of this matter. today there was, i think, a sign of progress toward exposing and perhaps ending that ridiculous exercise that that very partisan figure in wisconsin is heading up on behalf of the state s republicans. today wisconsin state attorney general josh kaul asked a judge to throw out the subpoenas this guy has sent out as part of his purported investigation. he told the court that those subpoenas were sent, quote, in furtherance of an unlawful inv
the two things, taxpayer money for-selected abortion, which nancy pelosi is for, or building a wall? which one is a moral? i don t believe that she is for sex-selective abortions. tucker: yes, she is. yes, she is. that is an overreach of what she is for. tucker: in fact she is. the more moral use of the funding for the wall is to fix bridges and roads crumbling in the country that need repair and spend a couple of bucks on doorbells for the border securityuc if you re worried about it. it s not as big of a problem. what is immoral is the president making a problem that doesn t exist. tucker: really quick. at the same tame, again, that she was pushing against america s ability to defend the borders and for more taxpayer funded abortions in other countries, she s also pushing for more foreign aid for countries some of which would go to border security. we funded with her approval border security and walls in a bunch of other o countries. why were those not immoral but our wal