issue, only this time her answer was different. she said that she had been asked the question a million times and the answer, quote, remains the same. but, in fact, the first time, instead of saying the president had never spoken to hunter about his business dealings, she said this. the president was never in business with his son. so on wednesday, phil wegman from real clear politics pointed out the inconsistency, but john pierr pierre insisted it was the same. i just want to clear this up once for all. the president has said he s never discussed overseas business dealings with his son, but the white house now says that the president has never been in business with his son. so why the updated language? which statement is true? or is it semantics and they are both true? as i stated on monday, when i was asked this question multiple times, nothing has changed. nothing has changed. nothing has changed on this. and so you can ask me a million different ways on this quest
somewhere near 5% reporting. biologics came with some of these recoveries. human or non-human buy logics? nonhuman. the more we understand, the safer we will be. the ducks have scored 1-0 netherlands! tied at 1, she did it, horan. i felt the momentum the whole time. we fixed things right away, proud of the team and their response. you roll up your sleeves, find your grit and then you find your goals. usa! good morning, everyone. as you can see there s a lot of news, a lot of soccer excitement. i have to call it football at this point. excitement, fever of the women and the world cup. and a totally unexpected event in a federal courthouse yesterday. that is for sure. this morning hunter biden s plea deal is on hold and potentially in jeopardy after really falling apart in that courtroom. a very dramatic court hearing wednesday. the judge questioning the deal. the president s son had been preparing to plead guilty to tax crimes and also avoid prosecution
smerconish in philadelphia. in september of 2019, joe biden was asked how many$#ursqj he ha spoken to son hunter about his overseas business activities. the then candidate s answer a was this. i have never spoken to my son about that. that has remained his answer until this week. on monday white house press secretary was asked about this issue, only this time her answer was different. she said that she had been asked the question a million times and the answer remains the same. but in fact the first time instead of saying the president had never spoken to hunter about his business dealings, she said this. the president was never in business with his son. so on wednesday, phil wegman pointed out the insistent sit, but she insisted the answer was the same. i just want to clear this up once if and are all. the president has said he s never discussed overseas business dealings with his son, but the white house now says that the president has never been in business with
good to be with you. john: i m john roberts and washington. today is highly anticipated testimony will come from two irs agents who claimed that they took several steps to delay their investigation of the president s son. sandra: many want answers. fox news team coverage begins now. shannon bream and jonathan turley standing by. john: but we begin with chad pergram, live on capitol hill where this hearing is about to get underway. we can hear some protesters in the hallway outside. what is james comer saying about what we are going to see today? well, that sheer man, he calls this a pivotal moment in his investigation. he has two witnesses testifying today. one we know, gary shapley. the other, whistle-blower x. this is important for the house oversight committee. they believe that they will deliver the goods on the bidens. we believe that it would be the irs. leadership in the criminal division. that s what these two guys are. i am the only one investigating joe
to? who has a family of high ranking government officials receiving money, car and luxury items from a foreign government? you might have said senator menendez. you d be right. hunter biden would also receive those same things. mr. turley, in your experience, is it a concerning that a public official like joe biden is involved with the cefc china energy company with ties to ccp and chairman yi who was later detined by china for fraud? certainly is a concern that some of these individuals have been either accused or has been convicted of fraud including one by the united states government. the question is whether that conduct extended to the vice president or the president today and whether that is part of a continue you ll of conduct. when you see a pattern of problems, particularly in corruption, doesn t that pattern continue? a cover up. do you agree with that statement? i do. we call it pattern ed. that s what we look for when doing investigations to see what is cont